The Evaluators' Eye [electronic resource] : Impact Assessment and Academic Peer Review / by Gemma Derrick.
2018
LB2300-2799.3
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Cite
Citation
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Concurrent users
Unlimited
Authorized users
Authorized users
Document Delivery Supplied
Can lend chapters, not whole ebooks
Details
Title
The Evaluators' Eye [electronic resource] : Impact Assessment and Academic Peer Review / by Gemma Derrick.
Author
ISBN
9783319636276
3319636278
331963626X
9783319636269
331963626X
9783319636269
3319636278
331963626X
9783319636269
331963626X
9783319636269
Published
Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
Language
English
Description
1 online resource (XV, 230 pages 3 illustrations, 1 illustration in color.) : online resource
Item Number
10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6 doi
9783319636269
9783319636269
Call Number
LB2300-2799.3
Dewey Decimal Classification
378
Summary
This book offers an empirical analysis of how academic peer review panels mediate the traditionally non-academic criterion of societal impact. The UK's 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) for the first time included an "Impact" criterion that considered how research had influenced society, beyond academia. Using a series of interviews with REF2014 Main Panel A evaluators, the book explores how a dominant definition of Impact was constructed within panels and how this led to the development of strategies around valuing it as an ambiguous object. By doing so, Derrick brings a unique perspective to Impact that is currently overlooked in the dominant Impact evaluation discourse. Through examining the evaluation procedure as a dynamic process it is argued that the best models, strategies and insights for Impact evaluation are those constructed in practice, within peer review groups. By exploring the legitimacy of peer review as a tool to assess the societal impact of research, Derrick states that the future for Impact evaluation is not to seek alternative tools where peer review seemingly fails, but instead to highlight ways in which peer review panels can work smarter. The book will be essential reading for students, academics and policy-makers working in Education, as well as researchers interested in peer review processes and the research evaluation frameworks and audit exercises globally.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Digital File Characteristics
text file PDF
Available in Other Form
Print version: 9783319636269
Linked Resources
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Impact from the Evaluator's Eye
Chapter 2. Peer Review of Impact: Could it Work?
Chapter 3. Evaluation Mechanics
Chapter 4. Introducing Impact to the Evaluators
Chapter 5. Peers, Experts and Impact
Chapter 6. Risking Groupthink in Impact Assessment
Chapter 7. Working Smarter with Multiple Impacts and One Eye.
Chapter 2. Peer Review of Impact: Could it Work?
Chapter 3. Evaluation Mechanics
Chapter 4. Introducing Impact to the Evaluators
Chapter 5. Peers, Experts and Impact
Chapter 6. Risking Groupthink in Impact Assessment
Chapter 7. Working Smarter with Multiple Impacts and One Eye.