Intro; Acknowledgements; Contents; Chapter 1 Introduction; Part I Schellenberg's Hiddenness Argument; Chapter 2 Setting the Stage; 2.1 Hiddenness in a Literal Sense; 2.1.1 Missing His Presence-Hiddenness I; 2.1.2 His Incomprehensible Essence-Hiddenness II; 2.1.2.1 A Standard Issue; 2.1.2.2 Apophaticism; (a) A Plea for Silence; (b) Or Maybe Not?; (c) The Mystical Path; 2.1.2.3 What's Next?; 2.1.3 His Revelatory Works-Not That Hidden I; 2.1.3.1 The Special Revelation of God; 2.1.3.2 A Small Restriction; 2.1.3.3 Three Models of Revelation; (d) Divine Epiphany; (da) The Revelatory Event.

(Db) The Content of Revelation(e) Divine Instruction; (ea) The Revelatory Event; (eb) The Content of Revelation; (f) Divine Communion; (fa) The Revelatory Event; (fb) The Content of Revelation; 2.1.4 His Existence in Evidence-Not That Hidden II; 2.1.4.1 The General Revelation of God; (g) Biblical References; (h) Doctrinal Statements; (i) Systematic Classifications; (ia) A Natural Knowledge of God; (ib) The Twofold Model of Knowledge; 2.1.4.2 To Sum up: General vs. Special Revelation; 2.2 Hiddenness Taken Non-Literally; 2.2.1 The Occurrence of Nonresistant Nonbelief; 2.2.2 Two Final Notes.

Chapter 3 Its Most Recent Statement3.1 Preliminaria; 3.1.1 Anti-Theistic; 3.1.2 Deductive; 3.1.3 Evidentialistic; 3.1.3.1 There Is Only Weak Theistic Evidence; 3.1.3.2 Weak Theistic Evidence Is Strong Atheistic Evidence; 3.1.3.3 Belief That God Exists Needs Strong Theistic Evidence ...; 3.1.3.4 ... And Is Reasonable If There Is Strong Theistic Evidence; 3.1.4 Propositional and Experiential Hiddenness; 3.1.4.1 Propositional Hiddenness (ph); 3.1.4.2 Experiential Hiddenness (eh); 3.1.4.3 Ph and eh Taken Together; 3.1.5 Experiential and Propositional Evidence; 3.1.5.1 Experiential Evidence (ee)

3.1.5.2 Propositional Evidence (pe)3.1.5.3 Preventing Propositional Hiddenness (¬ph); (a) The Ability but Lack of Sufficient ee; (aa) The Ability of Sufficient ee; (ab) The Lack of Sufficient ee; (b) The Ability but Lack of Sufficient pe; (ba) The Ability of Sufficient pe; (bb) The Lack of Sufficient pe; 3.1.5.4 Preventing Experiential Hiddenness (¬eh); (c) The Ability but Lack of Sufficient ee II; (ca) The Ability of Sufficient ee II; (cb) The Lack of Sufficient ee II; 3.1.5.5 The Triple Ability of Sufficient ee; 3.1.5.6 Schellenberg's Focus on ¬ee and ph.

3.1.6 The Hiddenness Argument and the Argument from Evil3.2 The Argument Itself; 3.2.1 Divine Love-Premises (1) and (2); 3.2.1.1 Premise (1); (d) Subpremise (**1); (e) Subpremise (*1); (f) The Beneficiaries of Divine Love; 3.2.1.2 Premise (2); (g) Divine Relational-Personal Love; (h) Human Relational-Personal Love; (i) Theistic Biases; (j) A Personal Relationship; (k) Why God Is Always Open to Personal Relationship; (ka) Its Instrumental Value; (kb) Its Intrinsic Value; 3.2.2 Conclusio (3); 3.2.3 No Nonresistant Nonbelief to Be Expected-Premise (4); 3.2.3.1 Subpremise (****4)