001380696 000__ 03104cam\\2200529\a\4500
001380696 001__ 1380696
001380696 003__ OCoLC
001380696 005__ 20211214003146.0
001380696 008__ 111026s2012\\\\miu\\\\\\b\\\\001\0\eng\\
001380696 010__ $$a2011043629
001380696 019__ $$a785071842
001380696 020__ $$a9780472117925$$q(cloth ;$$qalk. paper)
001380696 020__ $$a0472117920$$q(cloth ;$$qalk. paper)
001380696 020__ $$z9780472027729$$q(e-book)
001380696 020__ $$z0472027727$$q(e-book)
001380696 035__ $$a(OCoLC)731913271
001380696 040__ $$aDLC$$beng$$cDLC$$dYDX$$dBTCTA$$dYDXCP$$dZYF$$dGZL$$dE7B$$dBWX$$dCDX$$dSTF$$dOCLCF$$dOCLCQ$$dOCLCO$$dGBVCP$$dOCLCQ$$dDGU$$dRCE$$dBUF$$dMCO$$dISE
001380696 042__ $$apcc
001380696 043__ $$an-us---
001380696 049__ $$aISEA
001380696 05000 $$aKF4772$$b.P54 2012
001380696 08200 $$a342.7308/53$$223
001380696 1001_ $$aPiety, Tamara R.
001380696 24510 $$aBrandishing the First Amendment :$$bcommercial expression in America /$$cTamara R. Piety.
001380696 260__ $$aAnn Arbor :$$bUniversity of Michigan Press,$$c©2012.
001380696 300__ $$axi, 328 pages ;$$c24 cm
001380696 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001380696 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
001380696 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
001380696 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 291-319) and index.
001380696 5050_ $$aCommercial and corporate speech -- The scope of commercial expression -- Why protect speech? Four fundamental interests -- Autonomy as a human interest -- Brands, information, and consumer "education" -- Advertising and manipulation -- Tough love paternalism -- The corporate person -- Commercial democracy -- Commercial expression and economic instability -- Commercial expression and environmental instability.
001380696 520__ $$aOver the past two decades, corporations and other commercial entities have used strategic litigation to win more expansive First Amendment protections for commercial speech, from the regulation of advertising to the role corporate interests play in the political process, most recently debated in the Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Piety argues that such an expansion of First Amendment speech rights imperils public health, safety, and welfare; the reliability of commercial and consumer information; the stability of financial markets; and the global environment. Beginning with an evaluation of commonly evoked philosophical justifications for freedom of expression, she determines that, while these are appropriate for the protection of an individual's rights, they should not be applied too literally to commercial expression because the corporate person is not the moral equivalent of the human person. Piety gathers evidence from public relations and marketing, behavioral economics, psychology, and cognitive studies to show how overly permissive extensions of First Amendment protections to commercial expression limit governmental power to address some of the major social, economic, and environmental challenges of our time. From publisher description.
001380696 650_0 $$aCorporate speech$$zUnited States.
001380696 650_0 $$aFreedom of speech$$zUnited States.
001380696 650_0 $$aAdvertising laws$$zUnited States.
001380696 650_7 $$aAdvertising laws.$$2fast$$0(OCoLC)fst00797864
001380696 650_7 $$aCorporate speech.$$2fast$$0(OCoLC)fst01202401
001380696 650_7 $$aFreedom of speech.$$2fast$$0(OCoLC)fst00934044
001380696 650_7 $$aRedefreiheit$$2gnd$$0(DE-601)104773774
001380696 651_7 $$aUnited States.$$2fast$$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
001380696 651_7 $$aUSA$$2gnd$$0(DE-601)106076612
001380696 852__ $$bgen$$hKF4772$$i.P54 2012
001380696 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1380696$$pGLOBAL_SET
001380696 980__ $$aBOOK
001380696 980__ $$aBIB