001386356 000__ 03475cam\a2200529Ia\4500
001386356 001__ 1386356
001386356 003__ MaCbMITP
001386356 005__ 20240325105128.0
001386356 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001386356 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
001386356 008__ 030711s2003\\\\mau\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
001386356 020__ $$a9780262284882$$q(electronic bk.)
001386356 020__ $$a026228488X$$q(electronic bk.)
001386356 020__ $$a0585456704$$q(electronic bk.)
001386356 020__ $$a9780585456706$$q(electronic bk.)
001386356 035__ $$a(OCoLC)52596692$$z(OCoLC)793524216$$z(OCoLC)847088853$$z(OCoLC)961657271$$z(OCoLC)962700336
001386356 035__ $$a(OCoLC-P)52596692
001386356 040__ $$aOCoLC-P$$beng$$epn$$cOCoLC-P
001386356 050_4 $$aQH76.5.C2$$bT54 2003eb
001386356 072_7 $$aSCI$$x088000$$2bisacsh
001386356 072_7 $$aNAT$$x037000$$2bisacsh
001386356 08204 $$a333.95/16/0976$$221
001386356 1001_ $$aThomas, Craig W.$$c(Associate professor of political science)
001386356 24510 $$aBureaucratic landscapes :$$binteragency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity /$$cCraig W. Thomas.
001386356 260__ $$aCambridge, Mass. :$$bMIT Press,$$c©2003.
001386356 300__ $$a1 online resource (xxii, 353 pages).
001386356 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001386356 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001386356 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001386356 4901_ $$aPolitics, science, and the environment
001386356 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001386356 520__ $$aPolitical scientists have long been concerned about the tension between institutional fragmentation and policy coordination in the U.S. bureaucracy. The literature is rife with examples of agencies competing with each other or asserting their independence, while cooperation is relatively rare. This is of particular importance in policy areas such as biodiversity, where species, habitats, and ecosystems cross various agency jurisdictions.Bureaucratic Landscapes explores the reasons for the success and failure of interagency cooperation, focusing on several case studies of efforts to preserve biodiversity in California. The book examines why public officials tried to cooperate and the obstacles they faced, providing indirect evidence of policy impacts as well. Among other topics, it examines the role of courts in prompting agency action, the role of scientific knowledge in organizational learning, and the emergence of new institutions to resolve collective-action problems. Notable findings include the crucial role of environmental lawsuits in prompting agency action and the surprisingly active role of the Bureau of Land Management in resource preservation.
001386356 588__ $$aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
001386356 650_0 $$aBiodiversity conservation$$xGovernment policy$$zCalifornia$$vCase studies.
001386356 650_0 $$aBiodiversity conservation$$xGovernment policy$$zUnited States$$vCase studies.
001386356 650_0 $$aNatural resources$$zCalifornia$$xManagement$$vCase studies.
001386356 650_0 $$aNatural resources$$zUnited States$$xManagement$$vCase studies.
001386356 650_0 $$aInterorganizational relations$$zCalifornia$$vCase studies.
001386356 650_0 $$aInterorganizational relations$$zUnited States$$vCase studies.
001386356 653__ $$aENVIRONMENT/Environmental Politics & Policy
001386356 655_0 $$aElectronic books
001386356 852__ $$bebk
001386356 85640 $$3MIT Press$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1699.001.0001?locatt=mode:legacy$$zOnline Access through The MIT Press Direct
001386356 85642 $$3OCLC metadata license agreement$$uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
001386356 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1386356$$pGLOBAL_SET
001386356 980__ $$aBIB
001386356 980__ $$aEBOOK
001386356 982__ $$aEbook
001386356 983__ $$aOnline