Phrasal movement and its kin / David Pesetsky.
2000
P296 .P48 2000eb
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Details
Title
Phrasal movement and its kin / David Pesetsky.
Author
ISBN
9780262281461 (electronic bk.)
0262281465 (electronic bk.)
9780262161961
0262161966
0262661667
9780262661669
0262281465 (electronic bk.)
9780262161961
0262161966
0262661667
9780262661669
Publication Details
Cambridge, Mass. ; London : MIT Press, ©2000.
Copyright
©2000
Language
English
Description
1 online resource (xi, 132 pages).
Call Number
P296 .P48 2000eb
Dewey Decimal Classification
415
Summary
This study investigates the types of movement and movement-like relations that link positions in syntactic structure. David Pesetsky argues that there are three such relations. Besides overt phasal movement, there are two distinct types of movement without phonological effect: covert phrasal movement and feature movement. Focusing on wh-questions, he shows how his classification of movement-like relations allows us to understand the story behind wh-questions in which an otherwise inviolable property of movement--"Attract Closest"--Appears to be violated. By demonstrating that more movement takes place in such configurations than previously suspected, he shows that Attract Closest is actually not violated at all in these cases. This conclusion draws on recent research in both syntax and semantics, and depends crucially on Pesetsky's expanded repertoire of movement-like relations. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No. 37.
Note
This study investigates the types of movement and movement-like relations that link positions in syntactic structure. David Pesetsky argues that there are three such relations. Besides overt phasal movement, there are two distinct types of movement without phonological effect: covert phrasal movement and feature movement. Focusing on wh-questions, he shows how his classification of movement-like relations allows us to understand the story behind wh-questions in which an otherwise inviolable property of movement--"Attract Closest"--Appears to be violated. By demonstrating that more movement takes place in such configurations than previously suspected, he shows that Attract Closest is actually not violated at all in these cases. This conclusion draws on recent research in both syntax and semantics, and depends crucially on Pesetsky's expanded repertoire of movement-like relations. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No. 37.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Source of Description
OCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
Record Appears in