001412090 000__ 03238cam\a2200541Ia\4500
001412090 001__ 1412090
001412090 003__ MaCbMITP
001412090 005__ 20240325105206.0
001412090 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001412090 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
001412090 008__ 051120s2001\\\\mau\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
001412090 020__ $$a9780262277174$$q(electronic bk.)
001412090 020__ $$a0262277174$$q(electronic bk.)
001412090 020__ $$z0262112639$$q(hc. ;$$qalk. paper)
001412090 020__ $$z0262611694$$q(pbk. ;$$qalk. paper)
001412090 020__ $$z9780262611695$$q(pbk.)
001412090 020__ $$z9780262112635$$q(hc.)
001412090 035__ $$a(OCoLC)62308703$$z(OCoLC)60750352$$z(OCoLC)71799422$$z(OCoLC)149646621$$z(OCoLC)508251402$$z(OCoLC)970357190$$z(OCoLC)979899172$$z(OCoLC)980253894$$z(OCoLC)990537225$$z(OCoLC)990654312$$z(OCoLC)1049616361$$z(OCoLC)1078047857
001412090 035__ $$a(OCoLC-P)62308703
001412090 040__ $$aOCoLC-P$$beng$$epn$$cOCoLC-P
001412090 050_4 $$aP299.D46$$bK56 2001eb
001412090 072_7 $$aLAN$$x006000$$2bisacsh
001412090 072_7 $$aLAN$$x009060$$2bisacsh
001412090 08204 $$a415$$222
001412090 1001_ $$aKing, Jeffrey C.
001412090 24510 $$aComplex demonstratives :$$ba quantificational account /$$cJeffrey C. King.
001412090 260__ $$aCambridge, Mass. :$$bMIT Press,$$c©2001.
001412090 264_4 $$c©2001
001412090 300__ $$a1 online resource (xiii, 207 pages).
001412090 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001412090 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001412090 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001412090 4901_ $$aContemporary philosophical monographs ;$$v2
001412090 500__ $$a"A Bradford book."
001412090 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001412090 520__ $$aSince the late 1970s, the orthodox view of complex 'that' phrases (e.g., 'that woman eating a granola bar') has been that they are contextually sensitive devices of direct reference. In Complex Demonstratives, Jeffrey King challenges that orthodoxy, showing that quantificational accounts not only are as effective as direct reference accounts but also handle a wider range of data.After providing arguments against direct reference accounts of 'that' phrases and developing a quantificational theory of them, King looks at the interaction of 'that' phrases with modal operators, negation, and verbs of propositional attitude. He argues for evidence of scope interaction between 'that' phrases and other scoped elements. King also addresses semantic properties of 'that' and other determiners, and the possibility of extending the semantics of 'that' phrases to 'that' as a syntactically simple demonstrative. Finally, he argues against what he calls ambiguity approaches, theories that hold that the various uses of 'that' phrases cannot be treated by a single semantical theory.
001412090 588__ $$aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
001412090 650_0 $$aGrammar, Comparative and general$$xDemonstratives.
001412090 650_0 $$aGrammar, Comparative and general$$xQuantifiers.
001412090 650_0 $$aReference (Linguistics)
001412090 653__ $$aLINGUISTICS & LANGUAGE/General
001412090 655_0 $$aElectronic books
001412090 852__ $$bebk
001412090 85640 $$3MIT Press$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1990.001.0001?locatt=mode:legacy$$zOnline Access through The MIT Press Direct
001412090 85642 $$3OCLC metadata license agreement$$uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
001412090 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1412090$$pGLOBAL_SET
001412090 980__ $$aBIB
001412090 980__ $$aEBOOK
001412090 982__ $$aEbook
001412090 983__ $$aOnline