Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. The Pandemic of Argumentation
Part I: Arguing About The Pandemic
Chapter 2. Arguing About "COVID": Metalinguistic Arguments on What Counts As A "Covid-19 Death". Chapter 3. 'Covid-19': Meaning and Reference
Chapter 4. Political Interference and Argumentative Styles
Chapter 5. The Evaluative Component in Pragmatic Argumentation: An Analysis of Public Discourse During the First Wave of the Sars-Cov-2 Pandemic in Italy
Chapter 6. Spaces of Argumentation and their Interaction: Some Elements of Thought Inspired by Controversies and Dispute in France During the Covid-19 Crisis
Chapter 7. The Argumentative Potential of Doubt: From Legitimate Concerns to Conspiracy Theories About Covid-19 Vaccines. Chapter 8. Analysing the Public Debate About Lockdown
Chapter 9. Responding to the COVID Conspiracy Theories: Why Narratives Themselves are More Powerful Arguments than Fact-Checking
Chapter 10. Reshaping Society through an Expanded Understanding of the Role of Analogy: Or How the Co-Vid Crisis Can Lead to a Better World
Chapter 11. Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situations of Uncertainty
Chapter 12. Conditional Perfection, Scientific Schizophrenia and Political Decisions: On the Argumentative Dark Side of Pandemic Discourse
Part II: Justifying and Promoting Health Policies
Chapter 13. Good and Ought in Argumentation: COVID-19 as a Case Study
Chapter 14. Visual Argumentation and Law: Broadcasting and Justifying the Norms During the Pandemic
Chapter 15. Securitisation and the Rediscovery of the Invisible Enemy in Times of Pandemic: Analysing Political Discourses from the European South
Chapter 16. The UK Government's 'Balancing Act' in the Pandemic. Arguing from Competing Concerns: Lives, Livelihoods and Liberties
Chapter 17. Practical Conflicts between Law and Morality: An Argumentative Analysis of the Case of Coronavirus Contact-Tracing Apps
Chapter 18. How to Deal with Deep Disagreements? The Role of Rhetoric in Crisis Communication: The Case of COVID-19
Chapter 19. On Arguments from Ignorance in Policy-Making
Chapter 20. Persuasion, Politics, and COVID-19: Audience as a Political Category
Part III: Elements of Argumentative Literacy
Chapter 21. Inoculating Students Against Conspiracy Theories: The Case of Covid-19
Chapter 22. Staying up to Date with Argument Checking: Outdated News as Defeasible Arguments
Chapter 23. Combatting Conspiratorial Thinking with Controlled Argumentation Dialogue Environments
Chapter 24. Is Interpretation of Conspiracy Theories done in a Fair and Useful Way?
Chapter 25. How to Handle Reasonable Disagreement: The Case of Covid-19
Chapter 26. Constructing Arguments about COVID-19 Governmental Guidelines
Chapter 27. "I (Don't) Agree with You, So You Are (In)Competent" The Role of One's Own Opinion in Accepting Arguments from Expert Opinion.
Part I: Arguing About The Pandemic
Chapter 2. Arguing About "COVID": Metalinguistic Arguments on What Counts As A "Covid-19 Death". Chapter 3. 'Covid-19': Meaning and Reference
Chapter 4. Political Interference and Argumentative Styles
Chapter 5. The Evaluative Component in Pragmatic Argumentation: An Analysis of Public Discourse During the First Wave of the Sars-Cov-2 Pandemic in Italy
Chapter 6. Spaces of Argumentation and their Interaction: Some Elements of Thought Inspired by Controversies and Dispute in France During the Covid-19 Crisis
Chapter 7. The Argumentative Potential of Doubt: From Legitimate Concerns to Conspiracy Theories About Covid-19 Vaccines. Chapter 8. Analysing the Public Debate About Lockdown
Chapter 9. Responding to the COVID Conspiracy Theories: Why Narratives Themselves are More Powerful Arguments than Fact-Checking
Chapter 10. Reshaping Society through an Expanded Understanding of the Role of Analogy: Or How the Co-Vid Crisis Can Lead to a Better World
Chapter 11. Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situations of Uncertainty
Chapter 12. Conditional Perfection, Scientific Schizophrenia and Political Decisions: On the Argumentative Dark Side of Pandemic Discourse
Part II: Justifying and Promoting Health Policies
Chapter 13. Good and Ought in Argumentation: COVID-19 as a Case Study
Chapter 14. Visual Argumentation and Law: Broadcasting and Justifying the Norms During the Pandemic
Chapter 15. Securitisation and the Rediscovery of the Invisible Enemy in Times of Pandemic: Analysing Political Discourses from the European South
Chapter 16. The UK Government's 'Balancing Act' in the Pandemic. Arguing from Competing Concerns: Lives, Livelihoods and Liberties
Chapter 17. Practical Conflicts between Law and Morality: An Argumentative Analysis of the Case of Coronavirus Contact-Tracing Apps
Chapter 18. How to Deal with Deep Disagreements? The Role of Rhetoric in Crisis Communication: The Case of COVID-19
Chapter 19. On Arguments from Ignorance in Policy-Making
Chapter 20. Persuasion, Politics, and COVID-19: Audience as a Political Category
Part III: Elements of Argumentative Literacy
Chapter 21. Inoculating Students Against Conspiracy Theories: The Case of Covid-19
Chapter 22. Staying up to Date with Argument Checking: Outdated News as Defeasible Arguments
Chapter 23. Combatting Conspiratorial Thinking with Controlled Argumentation Dialogue Environments
Chapter 24. Is Interpretation of Conspiracy Theories done in a Fair and Useful Way?
Chapter 25. How to Handle Reasonable Disagreement: The Case of Covid-19
Chapter 26. Constructing Arguments about COVID-19 Governmental Guidelines
Chapter 27. "I (Don't) Agree with You, So You Are (In)Competent" The Role of One's Own Opinion in Accepting Arguments from Expert Opinion.