001433037 000__ 05144cam\a2200553\i\4500
001433037 001__ 1433037
001433037 003__ OCoLC
001433037 005__ 20230309003546.0
001433037 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001433037 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
001433037 008__ 201222s2021\\\\ne\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
001433037 019__ $$a1228033829$$a1238201604$$a1249945085
001433037 020__ $$a9789462654273$$qelectronic book
001433037 020__ $$a9462654271$$qelectronic book
001433037 020__ $$z9462654263
001433037 020__ $$z9789462654266
001433037 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-94-6265-427-3$$2doi
001433037 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1227892860
001433037 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$erda$$cYDX$$dYDXIT$$dOCLCO$$dEBLCP$$dN$T$$dOCLCF$$dSFB$$dGW5XE$$dDCT$$dUKAHL$$dLEATE$$dZCL$$dOCLCO$$dOCLCQ
001433037 049__ $$aISEA
001433037 050_4 $$aKZ7050$$b.Z36 2021
001433037 08204 $$a345$$223
001433037 1001_ $$aBorda, Aldo Zammit,$$eauthor.
001433037 24510 $$aHistories written by international criminal courts and tribunals :$$bdeveloping a responsible history framework /$$cAldo Borda Zammit.
001433037 264_1 $$aThe Hague :$$bT.M.C. Asser Press,$$c2021.
001433037 300__ $$a1 online resource
001433037 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001433037 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001433037 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001433037 347__ $$atext file$$bPDF$$2rda
001433037 4901_ $$aInternational criminal justice series,$$x2352-6718 ;$$vvolume 26
001433037 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
001433037 5050_ $$aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Approaches to the History-Writing Function in International Criminal Adjudication -- Chapter 3. The Individual-Centred Lens -- Chapter 4. The Crime-Driven Lens -- Chapter 5. The Law-Affirming Lens -- Chapter 6. The Distinctive Approaches Of History And Law -- Chapter 7. Aiming Towards Responsible History in International Criminal Adjudication -- Chapter 8. Conclusion.
001433037 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001433037 520__ $$aThis book argues for a more moderate approach to history-writing in international criminal adjudication by articulating the elements of a "responsible history" normative framework. The question of whether international criminal courts and tribunals (ICTs) ought to write historical narratives has gained renewed relevance in the context of the recent turn to history in international criminal law, the growing attention to the historical legacies of the ad hoc Tribunals and the minimal attention paid to historical context in the first judgment of the International Criminal Court. The starting point for this discussion is that, in cases of mass atrocities, prosecutors and judges are inevitably understood to be engaged in writing history and influencing collective memory, whether or not they so intend. Therefore, while writing history is an inescapable feature of ICTs, there is still today significant lack of consensus over the proper place of this function. Since Hannah Arendt articulated her doctrine of strict legality, in response to the prosecutor's expansive didactic approach in Eichmann, the legal debate on the subject has been largely polarised between restrictive and expansive approaches to history-writing in mass atrocity trials. What has been noticeably missing from this debate is the middle ground. The contribution this book seeks to make is precisely to articulate a framework that occupies that ground. The book asks: what are the lenses through which judges of ICTs interpret historical events and what kind of histories do ICTs write? and what kinds of histories should ICTs produce? Its arguments for a more moderate approach to history-writing are based on three distinct, but interrelated reasons: (1) Truth and Justice; (2) Right to Truth; and (3) Legal Epistemology. Different target audiences may benefit from this book. Court officials and legal practitioners may find the normative framework developed herein useful in addressing the tensions between the competing objectives of ICTs and, in particular, in assessing the value of the history-writing function. Lawyers, historians and other academics may also find the analysis of the strengths, constraints and blind spots of the historical narratives written by ICTs interesting. This issue is particularly timely in view of current debates on the legacies of ICTs. Aldo Zammit Borda is Director of the Centre for Access to Justice and Inclusion at Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
001433037 588__ $$aDescription based upon online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed January 11, 2021).
001433037 650_0 $$aInternational criminal law$$xHistory.
001433037 650_6 $$aDroit international pénal$$xHistoire.
001433037 655_7 $$aHistory.$$2fast$$0(OCoLC)fst01411628
001433037 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001433037 7730_ $$tSpringer Nature eBook$$w(OCoLC-LEATE)288477
001433037 77608 $$iPrint version:$$aBorda, Aldo Zammit.$$tHistories written by international criminal courts and tribunals$$dThe Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press 2021$$z9462654263$$z9789462654266$$w(OCoLC)1196240973
001433037 830_0 $$aInternational criminal justice series ;$$vv. 26.$$x2352-6718
001433037 852__ $$bebk
001433037 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-6265-427-3$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001433037 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1433037$$pGLOBAL_SET
001433037 980__ $$aBIB
001433037 980__ $$aEBOOK
001433037 982__ $$aEbook
001433037 983__ $$aOnline
001433037 994__ $$a92$$bISE