001433404 000__ 03585cam\a2200553\i\4500
001433404 001__ 1433404
001433404 003__ OCoLC
001433404 005__ 20230309003604.0
001433404 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001433404 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
001433404 008__ 210110s2021\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
001433404 019__ $$a1231611119$$a1237456529$$a1238206234
001433404 020__ $$a9783030598013$$q(electronic bk.)
001433404 020__ $$a3030598012$$q(electronic bk.)
001433404 020__ $$z3030598004
001433404 020__ $$z9783030598006
001433404 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-59801-3$$2doi
001433404 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1229972903
001433404 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$epn$$cYDX$$dGW5XE$$dDCT$$dEBLCP$$dSFB$$dN$T$$dOCLCO$$dHTM$$dUKMGB$$dOCLCF$$dUKAHL$$dOCLCQ$$dOCLCO$$dOCLCQ
001433404 049__ $$aISEA
001433404 050_4 $$aJZ5675
001433404 08204 $$a327.1747$$223
001433404 1001_ $$aChappell, Brian K.
001433404 24510 $$aState responses to nuclear proliferation :$$bthe differential effects of threat perception /$$cBrian K. Chappell.
001433404 264_1 $$aCham :$$bPalgrave Macmillan,$$c2021.
001433404 300__ $$a1 online resource
001433404 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001433404 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001433404 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001433404 347__ $$atext file
001433404 347__ $$bPDF
001433404 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
001433404 5050_ $$a1. Introduction to The Study -- 2. Literature Review -- 3. Cognitive Psychological Influences -- 4. National Security Policy -- 5. Military Doctrine and Power Projection Capability -- 6. The Middle East States And Threat Perceptions -- 7. Analysis Of Data -- 8. Conclusion.
001433404 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001433404 520__ $$aContemporary fears of rogue state nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism pose unique challenges for the global community. This book offers a unique approach by examining why states that have the military capability to severely damage a proliferating state's nuclear program instead choose to pursue coercive diplomacy. The author argues cognitive psychological influences, including the trauma derived from national tragedies like the September 11th attacks and the Holocaust, and a history of armed conflict increase the threat perceptions of foreign policy decision-makers when confronting a state perceived to be challenging the existing power structure by pursuing a nuclear weapon. The powerful state's degree of perceived threat, combined with its national security policies, military power projection capabilities, and public support then influence whether it will take no action, use coercive diplomacy/sanctions, or employ military force to address the weaker state's nuclear ambitions. Brian K. Chappell, PhD served twenty-eight years in the United States Air Force and is a veteran of the Afghanistan War. He is a career Nuclear and Missile Operations Officer and has served as a Middle East policy senior advisor to the Under Secretary of the Air Force for International Affairs, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy.
001433404 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed March 11, 2021).
001433404 650_0 $$aNuclear nonproliferation.
001433404 650_0 $$aNuclear terrorism.
001433404 650_0 $$aSecurity, International.
001433404 650_6 $$aNon-prolifération nucléaire.
001433404 650_6 $$aTerrorisme nucléaire.
001433404 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001433404 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z3030598004$$z9783030598006$$w(OCoLC)1191244100
001433404 852__ $$bebk
001433404 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-59801-3$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001433404 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1433404$$pGLOBAL_SET
001433404 980__ $$aBIB
001433404 980__ $$aEBOOK
001433404 982__ $$aEbook
001433404 983__ $$aOnline
001433404 994__ $$a92$$bISE