TY  - GEN
AB  - "This book shows that constitutional courts exercise direct and indirect power on political branches through decision-making. The first face of judicial power is characterized by courts directing political actors to implement judicial decisions in specific ways. The second face leads political actors to anticipate judicial review and draft policies accordingly. The judicial political interaction originating from both faces is herein formally modeled. A cross-European comparison of pre-conditions of judicial power shows that the German Federal Constitutional Court is a well-suited representative case for a quantitative assessment of judicial power. Multinomial logistic regressions show that the court uses directives when evasion of decisions is costly while accounting for the governments ability to implement decisions. Causal analyses of the second face of judicial power show that bills exposed to legal signals are drafted accounting for the court. These findings re-shape our understanding of judicialization and shed light on a silent form of judicialization"--
AU  - Engst, Benjamin G.,
CN  - K487.P65
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7
DO  - doi
ID  - 1435900
KW  - Judicial process
KW  - Political questions and judicial power.
KW  - Judicial process
KW  - Judicial process
KW  - Processus judiciaire
KW  - Politique et pouvoir judiciaire.
KW  - Processus judiciaire
KW  - Processus judiciaire
LK  - https://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7
N2  - "This book shows that constitutional courts exercise direct and indirect power on political branches through decision-making. The first face of judicial power is characterized by courts directing political actors to implement judicial decisions in specific ways. The second face leads political actors to anticipate judicial review and draft policies accordingly. The judicial political interaction originating from both faces is herein formally modeled. A cross-European comparison of pre-conditions of judicial power shows that the German Federal Constitutional Court is a well-suited representative case for a quantitative assessment of judicial power. Multinomial logistic regressions show that the court uses directives when evasion of decisions is costly while accounting for the governments ability to implement decisions. Causal analyses of the second face of judicial power show that bills exposed to legal signals are drafted accounting for the court. These findings re-shape our understanding of judicialization and shed light on a silent form of judicialization"--
SN  - 9783030460167
SN  - 3030460169
T1  - The two faces of judicial power :dynamics of judicial-political bargaining /
TI  - The two faces of judicial power :dynamics of judicial-political bargaining /
UR  - https://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7
ER  -