001435900 000__ 03541cam\a2200577\i\4500
001435900 001__ 1435900
001435900 003__ OCoLC
001435900 005__ 20230309003958.0
001435900 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001435900 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
001435900 008__ 210420t20212021sz\a\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
001435900 020__ $$a9783030460167$$q(electronic bk.)
001435900 020__ $$a3030460169$$q(electronic bk.)
001435900 020__ $$z9783030460150
001435900 020__ $$z3030460150
001435900 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7$$2doi
001435900 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1246675205
001435900 040__ $$aGW5XE$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cGW5XE$$dOCLCO$$dUCILW$$dOCLCO$$dOCL$$dN$T$$dOCLCQ$$dOCLCO$$dCOO$$dOCLCQ
001435900 043__ $$ae------$$ae-gx---
001435900 049__ $$aISEA
001435900 050_4 $$aK487.P65
001435900 08204 $$a340/.11$$223
001435900 1001_ $$aEngst, Benjamin G.,$$eauthor.
001435900 24514 $$aThe two faces of judicial power :$$bdynamics of judicial-political bargaining /$$cBenjamin G. Engst.
001435900 264_1 $$aCham, Switzerland :$$bPalgrave Macmillan,$$c[2021]
001435900 264_4 $$c©2021
001435900 300__ $$a1 online resource (xvi, 245 pages) :$$billustrations
001435900 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001435900 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001435900 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001435900 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
001435900 5050_ $$aThe Two Faces of Judicial Power -- The Judicial-Policy-Dialog Game -- Judicial Power in Germany and the European Union -- The First Face of Judicial Power -- The Second Face of Judicial Power -- Conclusion : The Implications of Judicial Power.
001435900 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001435900 520__ $$a"This book shows that constitutional courts exercise direct and indirect power on political branches through decision-making. The first face of judicial power is characterized by courts directing political actors to implement judicial decisions in specific ways. The second face leads political actors to anticipate judicial review and draft policies accordingly. The judicial political interaction originating from both faces is herein formally modeled. A cross-European comparison of pre-conditions of judicial power shows that the German Federal Constitutional Court is a well-suited representative case for a quantitative assessment of judicial power. Multinomial logistic regressions show that the court uses directives when evasion of decisions is costly while accounting for the governments ability to implement decisions. Causal analyses of the second face of judicial power show that bills exposed to legal signals are drafted accounting for the court. These findings re-shape our understanding of judicialization and shed light on a silent form of judicialization"--$$cProvided by publisher.
001435900 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from digital title page (viewed July 8, 2022).
001435900 61010 $$aGermany.$$bBundesverfassungsgericht$$xDecision making$$xMathematical models.
001435900 650_0 $$aJudicial process$$xPolitical aspects.
001435900 650_0 $$aPolitical questions and judicial power.
001435900 650_0 $$aJudicial process$$zEurope$$xMathematical models.
001435900 650_0 $$aJudicial process$$zGermany$$xMathematical models.
001435900 650_6 $$aProcessus judiciaire$$xAspect politique.
001435900 650_6 $$aPolitique et pouvoir judiciaire.
001435900 650_6 $$aProcessus judiciaire$$zEurope$$xModèles mathématiques.
001435900 650_6 $$aProcessus judiciaire$$zAllemagne$$xModèles mathématiques.
001435900 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001435900 852__ $$bebk
001435900 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001435900 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1435900$$pGLOBAL_SET
001435900 980__ $$aBIB
001435900 980__ $$aEBOOK
001435900 982__ $$aEbook
001435900 983__ $$aOnline
001435900 994__ $$a92$$bISE