001436844 000__ 03709cam\a2200541\i\4500
001436844 001__ 1436844
001436844 003__ OCoLC
001436844 005__ 20230309004116.0
001436844 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001436844 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
001436844 008__ 210526s2021\\\\sz\a\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
001436844 020__ $$a9783030710408$$q(electronic bk.)
001436844 020__ $$a3030710408$$q(electronic bk.)
001436844 020__ $$z9783030710392
001436844 020__ $$z3030710394
001436844 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8$$2doi
001436844 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1252763792
001436844 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cYDX$$dGW5XE$$dOCLCO$$dEBLCP$$dN$T$$dOCLCF$$dUKAHL$$dOCLCO$$dOCLCQ$$dCOM$$dSFB$$dOCLCQ
001436844 049__ $$aISEA
001436844 050_4 $$aQP360.5$$b.B46 2021
001436844 08204 $$a612.8/233$$223
001436844 1001_ $$aBenetka, Gerhard,$$eauthor.
001436844 24510 $$aDiscussing cognitive neuroscience :$$bpsychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain /$$cGerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik.
001436844 264_1 $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c[2021]
001436844 264_4 $$c©2021
001436844 300__ $$a1 online resource :$$billustrations
001436844 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001436844 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001436844 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001436844 4901_ $$aAnnals of theoretical psychology ;$$vvolume 17
001436844 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
001436844 5050_ $$aChapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio and Thomas Fuchs holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique -- Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate thought
001436844 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001436844 520__ $$aThe sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and if possible considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet's classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight.
001436844 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed May 28, 2021).
001436844 650_0 $$aCognitive neuroscience.
001436844 650_6 $$aNeurosciences cognitives.
001436844 655_7 $$aLlibres electrònics.$$2thub
001436844 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001436844 7001_ $$aWerbik, Hans,$$d1941-$$eauthor.
001436844 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z3030710394$$z9783030710392$$w(OCoLC)1237344527
001436844 830_0 $$aAnnals of theoretical psychology (Springer (Firm)) ;$$v17.
001436844 852__ $$bebk
001436844 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001436844 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1436844$$pGLOBAL_SET
001436844 980__ $$aBIB
001436844 980__ $$aEBOOK
001436844 982__ $$aEbook
001436844 983__ $$aOnline
001436844 994__ $$a92$$bISE