001437607 000__ 05084cam\a2200529\i\4500
001437607 001__ 1437607
001437607 003__ OCoLC
001437607 005__ 20230309004224.0
001437607 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001437607 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
001437607 008__ 210627s2021\\\\sz\a\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
001437607 020__ $$a9783030730369$$q(electronic bk.)
001437607 020__ $$a3030730360$$q(electronic bk.)
001437607 020__ $$z9783030730352
001437607 020__ $$z3030730352
001437607 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-73036-9$$2doi
001437607 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1257705041
001437607 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cYDX$$dGW5XE$$dOCLCO$$dN$T$$dEBLCP$$dOCLCF$$dUKAHL$$dOCLCQ$$dOCLCO$$dOCLCQ
001437607 043__ $$ae------
001437607 049__ $$aISEA
001437607 050_4 $$aKJC3846.5$$bC53 2021
001437607 08204 $$a347/.053$$223
001437607 24500 $$aClass actions in Europe :$$bHoly Grail or a wrong trail? /$$cAlan Uzelac, Stefaan Voet, editors.
001437607 264_1 $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c[2021]
001437607 264_4 $$c©2021
001437607 300__ $$a1 online resource :$$billustrations (some color)
001437607 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001437607 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001437607 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001437607 4901_ $$aIus gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice,$$x1534-6781 ;$$vvolume 89
001437607 5050_ $$aIntroduction -- Part I Critical Perspectives on Collective Redress -- Evaluating Collective Redress: Models, Outcomes and Policy -- For the Defense: 28 Shades of European Class Actions -- Collectivization of Civil Procedure as a Negative Utopia? -- Part II Many Faces of Collective Litigation: National Perspectives From Europe -- Class Actions in Belgium: Did the Mountain Gave Birth to a Mouse? -- The Dawn of Collective Redress 3.0 in France -- Class Action and Group Litigation--a Norwegian Perspective -- Collective Redress from a Dutch and Transnational Perspective -- Rebooting Italian Class Actions -- Class Actions in the Nordic Legal Culture -- Challenges in Drafting and Application of the New Slovenian Collective Actions Act -- Part III What Europe Can Learn from the World? Topical Models of Class Actions in non-European Jurisdictions -- Empirical Data and the Powerful Lessons Learnt About Class Actions in Quebec- Collective Redress in Brazil: Success or Disappointment -- Class Actions for Private and Public Interests. A Perspective From China -- A Comparative Study of the Class Action Model in Europe and South Africa -- Part IV Comparative Studies on Collective Actions -- The Lessons of Air Freight Cartel and Petrobras: The Mechanisms of Coordination of Parallel Collective Lawsuits in Several Jurisdictions? -- Transnational Collective Actions: Perspectives from America and Europe.
001437607 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001437607 520__ $$aNot so long ago, class actions were considered to be a textbook example of American exceptionalism; many of their main features were assumed to be incompatible with the culture of the civil law world. However, the tide is changing; while there are now trends in the USA toward limiting or excluding class actions, notorious cases like Dieselgate are moving more and more European jurisdictions to extend the reach of their judicial collective redress mechanisms. For many new fans of class actions, collective redress has become a Holy Grail of sorts, a miraculous tool that will rejuvenate national systems of civil justice and grant them unprecedented power. Still, while the introduction of various forms of representative action has virtually become a fashion, it is anything but certain that attempting to transplant American-style class action will be successful. European judicial structures and legal culture(s) are fundamentally different, which poses a considerable challenge. This book investigates whether class actions in Europe are indeed a Holy Grail or just another wrong turn in the continuing pursuit of just and effective means of protecting the rights of citizens and businesses. It presents both positive and critical perspectives, supplemented by case studies on the latest collectivization trends in Europe--national civil justice systems. The book also shares the experiences of some non-European jurisdictions that have developed promising hybrid forms of collective redress, such as Canada, Brazil, China, and South Africa. In closing, a selection of topical international cases that raise interesting issues regarding the effectiveness of class actions in an international context are studied and discussed.
001437607 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed July 2, 2021).
001437607 650_0 $$aClass actions (Civil procedure)$$zEurope.
001437607 650_6 $$aActions collectives (Procédure civile)$$zEurope.
001437607 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001437607 7001_ $$aUzelac, Alan,$$eeditor.
001437607 7001_ $$aVoet, Stefaan,$$eeditor.
001437607 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z3030730352$$z9783030730352$$w(OCoLC)1241732698
001437607 830_0 $$aIus gentium (Dordrecht, Netherlands) ;$$vv. 89.$$x1534-6781
001437607 852__ $$bebk
001437607 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-73036-9$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001437607 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1437607$$pGLOBAL_SET
001437607 980__ $$aBIB
001437607 980__ $$aEBOOK
001437607 982__ $$aEbook
001437607 983__ $$aOnline
001437607 994__ $$a92$$bISE