001441036 000__ 03365cam\a2200529\i\4500
001441036 001__ 1441036
001441036 003__ OCoLC
001441036 005__ 20230309004716.0
001441036 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001441036 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
001441036 008__ 211130s2021\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
001441036 019__ $$a1286706148$$a1286790790$$a1286922982$$a1286951494
001441036 020__ $$a9783030888886$$q(electronic bk.)
001441036 020__ $$a3030888886$$q(electronic bk.)
001441036 020__ $$z9783030888879
001441036 020__ $$z3030888878
001441036 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-88888-6$$2doi
001441036 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1286660086
001441036 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cYDX$$dGW5XE$$dUKMGB$$dOCLCF$$dN$T$$dOCLCO$$dOCLCQ$$dUKAHL$$dMUU$$dOCLCQ
001441036 049__ $$aISEA
001441036 050_4 $$aPR4148.P5$$bS36 2021
001441036 08204 $$a821/.7$$223
001441036 1001_ $$aSchouten de Jel, Joshua,$$eauthor.
001441036 24510 $$aBlake and Lucretius :$$bthe atomistic materialism of the selfhood /$$cJoshua Schouten de Jel.
001441036 264_1 $$aCham :$$bPalgrave Macmillan,$$c[2021]
001441036 264_4 $$c©2021
001441036 300__ $$a1 online resource
001441036 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001441036 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001441036 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001441036 4901_ $$aNew antiquity
001441036 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
001441036 5050_ $$aChapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: The Epicurean and Lucretian Slur: Francis Bacon -- Chapter 3: The Epicurean and Lucretian Slur: Isaac Newton -- Chapter 4: Simulacra and the Selfhood -- Chapter 5: Urizenic Phantasiae -- Chapter 6: The Cosmic Chains of the Machina Mundi.
001441036 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001441036 520__ $$aThis book demonstrates the way in which William Blake aligned his idiosyncratic concept of the Selfhood the lens through which the despiritualised subject beholds the material world with the atomistic materialism of the Epicurean school as it was transmitted through the first-century BC Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius De Rerum Natura. By addressing this philosophical debt, this study sets out a threefold re-evaluation of Blakes work: to clarify the classical stream of Blakes philosophical heritage through Lucretius; to return Blake to his historical moment, a thirty-year period from 1790 to 1820 which has been described as the second Lucretian moment in England; and to employ a new exegetical model for understanding the phenomenological parameters and epistemological frameworks of Blakes mythopoeia. Accordingly, it is revealed that Blake was not only aware of classical atomistic cosmogony and sense-based epistemology but that he systematically mapped postlapsarian existence onto an Epicurean framework. Joshua Schouten de Jel is a recent doctoral graduate from the University of Plymouth, UK. He is the author of articles on William Blake, Mary Shelley, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
001441036 588__ $$aDescription based on print version record.
001441036 60010 $$aBlake, William,$$d1757-1827$$xPhilosophy.
001441036 60010 $$aLucretius Carus, Titus.
001441036 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001441036 77608 $$iPrint version:$$aSchouten de Jel, Joshua.$$tBlake and Lucretius.$$dBasingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2021$$z9783030888879$$w(OCoLC)1285689191
001441036 830_0 $$aNew antiquity.
001441036 852__ $$bebk
001441036 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-88888-6$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001441036 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1441036$$pGLOBAL_SET
001441036 980__ $$aBIB
001441036 980__ $$aEBOOK
001441036 982__ $$aEbook
001441036 983__ $$aOnline
001441036 994__ $$a92$$bISE