001444804 000__ 03284cam\a2200541Ii\4500
001444804 001__ 1444804
001444804 003__ OCoLC
001444804 005__ 20230310003728.0
001444804 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001444804 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
001444804 008__ 220304s2022\\\\sz\a\\\\ob\\\\000\0\eng\d
001444804 019__ $$a1301452268$$a1301480284$$a1301771197$$a1301905467$$a1301947384$$a1302001907$$a1302108827$$a1302126911$$a1302179998
001444804 020__ $$a9783030943233$$q(electronic bk.)
001444804 020__ $$a3030943232$$q(electronic bk.)
001444804 020__ $$z9783030943226$$q(print)
001444804 020__ $$z3030943224
001444804 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-94323-3$$2doi
001444804 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1301909127
001444804 040__ $$aGW5XE$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cGW5XE$$dYDX$$dEBLCP$$dOCLCO$$dOCLCF$$dUKAHL$$dOCLCQ
001444804 043__ $$af-sa---
001444804 049__ $$aISEA
001444804 050_4 $$aHT185
001444804 08204 $$a307.76096873/55$$223
001444804 1001_ $$aBodino, Miriam,$$eauthor.
001444804 24510 $$aReframing the role of public open space :$$bthe case of Cape Town /$$cMiriam Bodino.
001444804 264_1 $$aCham, Switzerland :$$bSpringer,$$c2022.
001444804 300__ $$a1 online resource (vi, 176 pages) :$$billustrations (some color).
001444804 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001444804 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001444804 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001444804 4901_ $$aPoliTO Springer series,$$x2509-7024
001444804 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references.
001444804 5050_ $$aIntroduction -- Defining the framework: geographical context -- Defining the framework: theoretical context -- Cape Town and the pursuit of inclusion -- Learning from Cape Town desegregation: Khayelitsha -- Conclusions.
001444804 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001444804 520__ $$aThis book explores the growing spatial inequality in contemporary cities, and the opportunity of reframing the role of public open space as a tool of inclusion in a context of an increasing economic gap between the urban poor and rich. The first part outlines the geographical and theoretical frames of reference, which are then tested in the analysis of a case study: Cape Town. This city in South Africa was selected since its spatial aspects of separation are particularly evident due to the legacy of both apartheid and modernism. The examination of the policies of the City of Cape Town confirms the rising attention to public space since the 1990s. This slow progress of desegregation is tested through a critical study of one of the most disadvantaged areas of the city, Khayelitsha. The book explores the relevance and impact of an urban-design project, and reframes the role of public open space not only as a tool for restructuring the apartheid city, but also for reinterpreting other fragmented contemporary cities.
001444804 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed March 4, 2022).
001444804 650_0 $$aPublic spaces$$zSouth Africa$$zCape Town.
001444804 650_0 $$aCity planning$$zSouth Africa$$zCape Town.
001444804 650_6 $$aEspaces publics$$zAfrique du Sud$$zLe Cap.
001444804 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001444804 77608 $$iPrint version: $$z3030943224$$z9783030943226$$w(OCoLC)1287922774
001444804 830_0 $$aPoliTO Springer series,$$x2509-7024
001444804 852__ $$bebk
001444804 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-94323-3$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001444804 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1444804$$pGLOBAL_SET
001444804 980__ $$aBIB
001444804 980__ $$aEBOOK
001444804 982__ $$aEbook
001444804 983__ $$aOnline
001444804 994__ $$a92$$bISE