001449502 000__ 04934cam\a2200517\i\4500
001449502 001__ 1449502
001449502 003__ OCoLC
001449502 005__ 20230310004403.0
001449502 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001449502 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
001449502 008__ 220914s2022\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\000\0\eng\d
001449502 019__ $$a1344324393
001449502 020__ $$a9783031075902$$q(electronic bk.)
001449502 020__ $$a3031075900$$q(electronic bk.)
001449502 020__ $$z9783031075896
001449502 020__ $$z3031075897
001449502 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-031-07590-2$$2doi
001449502 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1344377449
001449502 040__ $$aGW5XE$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cGW5XE$$dYDX$$dEBLCP$$dOCLCF$$dN$T$$dOCLCQ
001449502 043__ $$ae------
001449502 049__ $$aISEA
001449502 050_4 $$aKJE7975
001449502 08204 $$a345.4$$223/eng/20220914
001449502 1001_ $$aGraat, Joske,$$eauthor.
001449502 24514 $$aThe European arrest warrant and EU citizenship :$$bEU citizenship in relation to foreseeability problems in the surrender procedure /$$cJoske Graat.
001449502 264_1 $$aCham, Switzerland :$$bSpringer,$$c2022.
001449502 300__ $$a1 online resource (xi, 408 pages)
001449502 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001449502 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001449502 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001449502 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references.
001449502 5050_ $$aIntroduction -- Setting the scene -- The legality principle: its link to the EAW, jurisdiction and forum choices -- The FDEAW: safeguards against unforeseeable jurisdiction claims and the risk of arbitrary forum decisions? -- The Dutch legal order: the views on the two complications and their link to the EAW -- The German legal order: the views on the two complications and their link to the EAW -- The legal order of England and Wales: the views on the two complications and their link to the EAW -- The syntheses: to what extent is a triangular link between the EAW, the legality principle and the risk of unforeseeable jurisdiction claims and arbitrary forum choices recognised on the EU and national level? -- The intergovernmental perspective: an explanation for the state-focused interpretation of the legality principle and lack of attention for the problems with which EU citizens can be confronted -- Does the intergovernmental shoe still fit? The rise of an alternative perspective: transnational cooperation in a shared legal order -- A transnational legality principle and its possible effect on the EAW -- EU citizenship as a vehicle towards a transnational legality principle: two possible narratives -- Conclusions and recommendations.
001449502 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001449502 520__ $$aThis book offers an in-depth analysis of the relationship between EU citizenship, the European arrest warrant (EAW), and the legality principle. It focuses on the role of the EAW in relation to two foreseeability problems with which EU citizens -- especially those who exercise free movement rights -- could be confronted. These problems concern the foreseeability of specific national criminal laws at the time of the offense on the one hand and forum decisions on the other. The first part of the book addresses the extent to which these foreseeability problems and the role of the EAW therein are viewed as legality problems at the EU level and in three national legal orders (the Netherlands, Germany, and England and Wales). In turn, the second part of the book critically examines the current scope and content of the legality principle in light of the EU's objective to offer its citizens an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) in which both safety and free movement are guaranteed. As EU citizens often encounter foreseeability problems when exercising their free movement rights, it is argued that they should be protected by a transnational framework of fundamental rights. The book subsequently makes recommendations for a transnational interpretation of the legality principle, one which fits the normative context of the AFSJ as described in Article 3(2) TEU. On the basis of the evolution of EU citizenship over time, the book also develops two EU citizenship narratives and explains how they could contribute to transnational fundamental rights protection and a solution to foreseeability problems. With regard to arriving at concrete solutions, the book offers recommendations for EU legislation that could adequately remedy foreseeability problems and the role of the EAW therein.
001449502 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed September 14, 2022).
001449502 650_0 $$aCriminal law$$zEuropean Union countries.
001449502 650_0 $$aCriminal jurisdiction$$zEuropean Union countries.
001449502 650_0 $$aCriminal procedure$$zEuropean Union countries.
001449502 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001449502 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z3031075897$$z9783031075896$$w(OCoLC)1317832831
001449502 852__ $$bebk
001449502 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-07590-2$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001449502 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1449502$$pGLOBAL_SET
001449502 980__ $$aBIB
001449502 980__ $$aEBOOK
001449502 982__ $$aEbook
001449502 983__ $$aOnline
001449502 994__ $$a92$$bISE