Go to main content

Judicial decision-making : integrating empirical and theoretical perspectives / Piotr Bystranowski, Bartosz Janik, Maciej Próchnicki, editors.

Bystranowski, Piotr, editor.; Janik, Bartosz, editor.; Próchnicki, Maciej, editor.
2022
K2146
Available Online
Formats
Format
BibTeX
MARCXML
TextMARC
MARC
DublinCore
EndNote
NLM
RefWorks
RIS
Add to Basket
Cite

Linked e-resources

Linked Resource
Online Access
Concurrent users
Unlimited
Authorized users
Authorized users
Document Delivery Supplied
Can lend chapters, not whole ebooks

Details

Title
Judicial decision-making : integrating empirical and theoretical perspectives / Piotr Bystranowski, Bartosz Janik, Maciej Próchnicki, editors.
ISBN
9783031117442 (electronic bk.)
3031117441 (electronic bk.)
9783031117435
3031117433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11744-2
Published
Cham : Springer, 2022.
Language
English
Description
1 online resource : illustrations (black and white, and color).
Item Number
10.1007/978-3-031-11744-2 doi
Call Number
K2146
Dewey Decimal Classification
347/.05
Summary
This book shares state-of-the-art insights on judicial decision-making from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. It offers in-depth coverage of the forefront of the field and reviews the most important issues and discussions connected with an empirical approach to judicial decision-making. It also addresses the challenges of judicial psychology to the ideal of rule of law and explores the promise and perils of applying artificial intelligence in law. In closing, it offers empirically-driven guidance on ways to improve the quality of legal reasoning.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Source of Description
Description based on print version record.
Added Author
Bystranowski, Piotr, editor.
Janik, Bartosz, editor.
Próchnicki, Maciej, editor.
Series
Economic analysis of law in European legal scholarship ; v.14.
Available in Other Form
Judicial decision-making.
Linked Resources
Online Access
Record Appears in
Online Resources > Ebooks
All Resources
Introduction
What do we Mean by Precedent? Empirical Evidence of Ordinary Usage
Severity Bias Across Different Types of Mens rea
"That's Him!": Evaluating a Hypothesis about Guilt Within the Context of a Suspect Lineup
Judicial Discretion and Debiasing
The Whole Truth About Dina: Judicial Reasoning and the Conjunction Fallacy
An Analytic Framework for the Study of Legal Actors
Judicial Activism The Need for Parameters: Analysis of Legal Reasoning in Judicial Review
How Authoritarian is the Slovenian Constitutional Court?
Hercules on a Diet
Exploring the Challenges of Artificial Judicial Decision Making for Liberal Democracy.

Browse Subjects

Show more subjects...

Statistics

from
to
Export