001451443 000__ 06560cam\a2200601\i\4500
001451443 001__ 1451443
001451443 003__ OCoLC
001451443 005__ 20230310004700.0
001451443 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001451443 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
001451443 008__ 221124s2022\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\000\0\eng\d
001451443 019__ $$a1351746827
001451443 020__ $$a9783031156915$$q(electronic bk.)
001451443 020__ $$a3031156919$$q(electronic bk.)
001451443 020__ $$z9783031156908
001451443 020__ $$z3031156900
001451443 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-031-15691-5$$2doi
001451443 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1351613866
001451443 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cYDX$$dGW5XE$$dEBLCP$$dOCLCQ$$dOCLCF
001451443 043__ $$ae------
001451443 049__ $$aISEA
001451443 050_4 $$aKJE7975
001451443 08204 $$a345.2401$$223/eng/20221216
001451443 1001_ $$aHernández López, Alejandro,$$eauthor.
001451443 24510 $$aConflicts of criminal jurisdiction and transfer of proceedings in the EU /$$cAlejandro Hernández López.
001451443 264_1 $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c[2022]
001451443 264_4 $$c©2022
001451443 300__ $$a1 online resource (xviii, 217 pages).
001451443 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001451443 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001451443 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001451443 4901_ $$aComparative, European and international criminal justice ;$$vvolume 3
001451443 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references.
001451443 5050_ $$aIntro -- Foreword -- Acknowlegements -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- Chapter 1: Jurisdiction and Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction Within the European Union -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Criminal Jurisdiction and ius puniendi -- 1.3 Grounds for Claiming Jurisdiction -- 1.3.1 Previous Considerations -- 1.3.2 Principle of Territoriality -- 1.3.3 Extraterritorial Principles for Claiming Jurisdiction -- 1.3.3.1 Principle of Personality -- 1.3.3.2 Principle of Protection -- 1.3.3.3 Principle of Universality -- 1.3.3.4 Principle of Vicarious or Representational Jurisdiction
001451443 5058_ $$a1.3.4 Rules on Jurisdiction Within International and Supranational Instruments -- 1.4 Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: General Profiles -- 1.4.1 The ``Hierarchy Issue ́́on the Allocation of Jurisdiction -- 1.4.2 Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction -- 1.4.2.1 Positive Conflicts of Jurisdiction -- 1.4.2.2 Negative Conflicts of Jurisdiction -- References -- Further Reading -- Chapter 2: EU Legal Framework on Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction -- 2.1 Primary Law -- 2.1.1 Background -- 2.1.2 Current Legal Basis in the Treaties -- 2.1.2.1 Art. 82(1)(b) TFEU -- 2.1.2.2 Art. 85(1)(c) TFEU
001451443 5058_ $$a2.1.2.3 Compatibility of Both Provisions -- 2.1.3 Other Relevant Primary Law: CISA and CFREU -- 2.2 The Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA -- 2.2.1 Background -- 2.2.2 Procedure -- 2.2.3 Limits and Shortcomings -- 2.3 The Role of Eurojust in the Prevention and Settlement of Conflicts of Jurisdiction -- 2.3.1 Background -- 2.3.2 Limited Powers Granted to Eurojust -- 2.3.3 Eurojustś Guidelines for Deciding on Jurisdiction -- 2.4 Lack of EU Instruments for Transfer of Criminal Proceedings -- 2.4.1 The Concentration of Proceedings as an Ideal Procedural Solution
001451443 5058_ $$a2.4.2 Transfer of Criminal Proceedings Provided by International Law -- 2.5 Implementation into National Law: The Spanish and Italian Examples -- 2.5.1 Procedure Acting as Contacting Authority -- 2.5.1.1 Spain -- 2.5.1.2 Italy -- 2.5.2 Procedure Acting as Contacted Authority -- 2.5.2.1 Spain -- 2.5.2.2 Italy -- 2.5.3 Agreement on the Settlement of the Conflict -- 2.5.3.1 Spain -- 2.5.3.2 Italy -- 2.5.4 Referring the Case to Eurojust -- 2.5.4.1 Spain -- 2.5.4.2 Italy -- References -- Further Reading -- Chapter 3: Conflicts of Jurisdiction and Due Process of Law -- 3.1 Introduction
001451443 5058_ $$a3.2 The ne bis in idem Principle -- 3.2.1 National Dimension -- 3.2.2 Transnational Dimension -- 3.3 Right to Be Heard by a Court Previously Established by Law -- 3.4 Substantive Legality -- 3.5 Procedural Safeguards and the Right to Defence of the Suspected or Accused Person -- 3.6 Victimś Interest in the Allocation of Jurisdiction -- 3.7 Negative Consequences for the Effective Prosecution of Crimes -- References -- Further Reading -- Chapter 4: Towards a New Model of Settlement of Conflicts: Background and Methodology -- 4.1 Foreword -- 4.2 Legislative Backgrounds
001451443 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001451443 520__ $$aFramework Decision 2009/948/JHA on the prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings established an ad hoc procedure for settling conflicts of criminal jurisdiction based on the mutual exchange of information and the establishment of direct consultations between the competent authorities with a view to reaching consensus on an effective solution. However, neither common legally binding criteria for deciding the best jurisdiction nor specific rules for the transfer of proceedings (which can occur after parallel proceedings have been identified) were established in this instrument, or in any other instrument adopted by the EU to date. This book analyses the current EU legal framework on conflicts of jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, paying special attention to its numerous shortcomings and loopholes from a fundamental rights and due process of law perspective. The book begins with an assessment of the various principles and grounds used by Member States for claiming criminal jurisdiction. Secondly, de lege lata EU procedure on the settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction, as well as its implementation in Spain and Italy, are thoroughly examined. After discussing the main principles and fundamental rights at stake, the author proposes two alternative and original de lege ferenda models for the prevention and settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, exploring the different possibilities offered by the EUs primary law.
001451443 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed December 16, 2022).
001451443 650_0 $$aCriminal jurisdiction$$zEuropean Union countries.
001451443 650_0 $$aCriminal justice, Administration of$$zEuropean Union countries.
001451443 650_0 $$aConflict of laws$$zEuropean Union countries.
001451443 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001451443 77608 $$iPrint version: $$z3031156900$$z9783031156908$$w(OCoLC)1337403378
001451443 830_0 $$aComparative, European and international criminal justice ;$$vv. 3.
001451443 852__ $$bebk
001451443 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-15691-5$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001451443 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1451443$$pGLOBAL_SET
001451443 980__ $$aBIB
001451443 980__ $$aEBOOK
001451443 982__ $$aEbook
001451443 983__ $$aOnline
001451443 994__ $$a92$$bISE