TY  - GEN
N2  - This book focuses on Edmund Husserls philosophical collaboration with Eugen Fink which took place in the early 1930s, and shows how their disagreement over the nature, origin, and aim of phenomenology led to a crucial divergence on the issue of who was engaging in phenomenology, and with what motivation. It provides a philosophical investigation of a key moment in the development of Husserls late phenomenology. The author claims that Husserls meta-phenomenological exploration of the theoretical and, importantly, practical underpinnings of the transcendental investigator leads him to affirm their humanity and, ultimately, to adopt an ethically charged ideal of "higher humanity" as telos of phenomenology. Fink argued that phenomenology was essentially an activity beyond the horizon of human possibility and history. In contrast, Dzanic illustrates how Husserl was looking for a way to theoretically unite the purity of transcendental insight with the existential reality and practical motives of the phenomenologist. Understanding the complex aspects of this debate is crucial for understanding the Crisis-period of Husserls thought. This text appeals to graduate students and researchers in phenomenology and related fields of philosophy.
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-031-22986-2
DO  - doi
AB  - This book focuses on Edmund Husserls philosophical collaboration with Eugen Fink which took place in the early 1930s, and shows how their disagreement over the nature, origin, and aim of phenomenology led to a crucial divergence on the issue of who was engaging in phenomenology, and with what motivation. It provides a philosophical investigation of a key moment in the development of Husserls late phenomenology. The author claims that Husserls meta-phenomenological exploration of the theoretical and, importantly, practical underpinnings of the transcendental investigator leads him to affirm their humanity and, ultimately, to adopt an ethically charged ideal of "higher humanity" as telos of phenomenology. Fink argued that phenomenology was essentially an activity beyond the horizon of human possibility and history. In contrast, Dzanic illustrates how Husserl was looking for a way to theoretically unite the purity of transcendental insight with the existential reality and practical motives of the phenomenologist. Understanding the complex aspects of this debate is crucial for understanding the Crisis-period of Husserls thought. This text appeals to graduate students and researchers in phenomenology and related fields of philosophy.
T1  - Transcendental phenomenology as human possibility :Husserl and Fink on the phenomenologizing subject /
AU  - Džanic, Denis,
VL  - volume 237
CN  - B829.5
ID  - 1454629
KW  - Phenomenology.
SN  - 9783031229862
SN  - 303122986X
TI  - Transcendental phenomenology as human possibility :Husserl and Fink on the phenomenologizing subject /
LK  - https://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-22986-2
UR  - https://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-22986-2
ER  -