Gain-based remedies for breach of contract : a comparative analysis of English and Polish law / Daniel Zatorski.
2023
KD1600 .Z38 2023
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Concurrent users
Unlimited
Authorized users
Authorized users
Document Delivery Supplied
Can lend chapters, not whole ebooks
Details
Title
Gain-based remedies for breach of contract : a comparative analysis of English and Polish law / Daniel Zatorski.
Author
ISBN
303125452X (electronic bk.)
9783031254529 (electronic bk.)
9783031254512
9783031254529 (electronic bk.)
9783031254512
Published
Cham, Switzerland : Springer, [2023]
Language
English
Description
1 online resource (vi, 167 pages) : illustrations
Item Number
10.1007/978-3-031-25452-9 doi
Call Number
KD1600 .Z38 2023
Dewey Decimal Classification
346.02/2
Summary
This book focuses on an emerging problem in English contract law: what should be done when a party has been unjustly enriched as the result of a breach of contract but there is no measurable loss suffered by said party? Two rulings are at the heart of the book: Wrotham Park Estate v Parkside Homes and Attorney-General v Blake. These two cases can be said to have established gain-based remedies in English contract law. However, the principles that underpin these remedies are not entirely clear and are subject to debate. This book analyses these principles through the lens of compensatory and restitutionary approaches. Moreover, it applies a comparative analysis of these approaches through the lens of the civil law jurisdiction in Poland. Since the term compensation is not a universal concept, the book distinguishes between two rationales in the compensatory analysis. The first, reparative compensation, is defined as a form of monetary recompense for loss or damage actually suffered. The second, substitutive compensation, represents a monetary equivalent to a right that a person has been deprived of or denied. Both rationales require the application of a broad notion of loss in order to make gain-based remedies workable in both English and Polish law. In contrast, restitution states that a person cannot be permitted to profit from their own wrongdoing. Based on this principle, the book argues that gain-based remedies could be applied under Polish law through the rules of unjust enrichment. However, in order to do so, a broader understanding of the subtraction prerequisite (the enrichment being at the aggrieved partys expense) would have to be adopted. The book concludes that unjust enrichment is a more natural way of implementing gain-based remedies in civil law jurisdictions.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Source of Description
Description based on print version record.
Linked Resources
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
1. Introduction and Methodology
2. Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract in General
3. Finding Gain-based Remedies under the Compensatory Principles
4. Finding Gain-Based Remedies under Restitutionary Principles
5. Summary and Conclusions
6. Bibliography.
2. Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract in General
3. Finding Gain-based Remedies under the Compensatory Principles
4. Finding Gain-Based Remedies under Restitutionary Principles
5. Summary and Conclusions
6. Bibliography.