001454698 000__ 03596cam\a22005057i\4500
001454698 001__ 1454698
001454698 003__ OCoLC
001454698 005__ 20230314003224.0
001454698 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
001454698 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
001454698 008__ 230220s2023\\\\sz\\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
001454698 020__ $$a9783031130014$$q(electronic bk.)
001454698 020__ $$a3031130014$$q(electronic bk.)
001454698 020__ $$z9783031130007
001454698 020__ $$z3031130006
001454698 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-031-13001-4$$2doi
001454698 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1370590548
001454698 040__ $$aGW5XE$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cGW5XE$$dEBLCP
001454698 043__ $$ae------
001454698 049__ $$aISEA
001454698 050_4 $$aKJC5183
001454698 08204 $$a345.4056$$223/eng/20230220
001454698 24500 $$aFairness in criminal appeal :$$ba critical and interdisciplinary analysis of the ECtHR case-law /$$cHelena Morão, Ricardo Tavares da Silva, editors.
001454698 264_1 $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c2023.
001454698 300__ $$a1 online resource
001454698 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
001454698 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
001454698 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
001454698 5050_ $$aPart I: Introduction -- The ECtHR case-law on immediacy in criminal appeal -- Part II: Criminal appeal immediacy models and the ECtHR case-law -- The evidence renewal model in Italy -- The retrial model in Spain -- The audio recordings model in Portugal: The appeal courts perspective -- The audio recordings model in Portugal: The defendants and the victims perspectives -- Part III: Immediacy in criminal procedure theory and cognitive sciences -- Immediacy at the first instance trial -- Audio-visual recordings as evidence in criminal procedure -- Neuroscience of memory and philosophy of knowledge challenges to immediacy -- AI assistance in the courtroom and immediacy -- Part IV: Concluding thoughts -- On the legitimacy of the ECtHRs criminal appeal immediacy requirement.
001454698 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
001454698 520__ $$aThis book addresses the European Court of Human Rights fairness standards in criminal appeal, filling a gap in this less researched area of studies. Based on a fair trial immediacy requirement, the Court has found several violations of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights at the appellate level by at least eighteen States of the Council of Europe in a vast array of cases, particularly in contexts of first instance acquittals overturning and of sentences increasing on appeal. On the one hand, the book critically engages this case-law with the law revisions it has recently inspired in European countries, as well as with the critiques and difficulties that it continues to raise. On the other hand, it interweaves insight from criminal procedure theory with new discoveries in the field of cognitive sciences (neuroscience of memory, philosophy of knowledge, AI), shedding an interdisciplinary light on the (in)adequacy and limits of the Strasbourg Courts jurisprudence.
001454698 588__ $$aDescription based on print version record.
001454698 61020 $$aEuropean Court of Human Rights$$1https://isni.org/isni/0000000121572700
001454698 650_0 $$aFair trial$$zEurope.
001454698 650_0 $$aCriminal procedure$$zEurope.
001454698 655_0 $$aElectronic books.
001454698 7001_ $$aMorão, Helena,$$eeditor.$$1https://isni.org/isni/0000000067649913
001454698 7001_ $$aTavares da Silva, Ricardo,$$eeditor.
001454698 77608 $$iPrint version:$$tFairness in criminal appeal.$$dCham : Springer, 2022$$z9783031130007$$w(OCoLC)1346944679
001454698 852__ $$bebk
001454698 85640 $$3Springer Nature$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-13001-4$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
001454698 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1454698$$pGLOBAL_SET
001454698 980__ $$aBIB
001454698 980__ $$aEBOOK
001454698 982__ $$aEbook
001454698 983__ $$aOnline
001454698 994__ $$a92$$bISE