001479556 000__ 07989nam\a22008535i\4500 001479556 001__ 1479556 001479556 003__ DE-B1597 001479556 005__ 20231026035059.0 001479556 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\ 001479556 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun 001479556 008__ 230918t20022002nyu\\\\\o\\d\z\\\\\\eng\d 001479556 020__ $$a9780814723012 001479556 0247_ $$a10.18574/nyu/9780814723012.001.0001$$2doi 001479556 035__ $$a(DE-B1597)548291 001479556 040__ $$aDE-B1597$$beng$$cDE-B1597$$erda 001479556 0410_ $$aeng 001479556 044__ $$anyu$$cUS-NY 001479556 050_4 $$aKF3760 .B35 2002 001479556 072_7 $$aLAW013000$$2bisacsh 001479556 08204 $$a344.730419 001479556 1001_ $$aBall, Howard, $$eauthor.$$4aut$$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut. 001479556 24514 $$aThe Supreme Court in the Intimate Lives of Americans :$$bBirth, Sex, Marriage, Childrearing, and Death /$$cHoward Ball. 001479556 264_1 $$aNew York, NY : : $$bNew York University Press, $$c[2002] 001479556 264_4 $$c©2002 001479556 300__ $$a1 online resource 001479556 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent 001479556 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia 001479556 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier 001479556 347__ $$atext file$$bPDF$$2rda 001479556 50500 $$tFrontmatter -- $$tContents -- $$tAcknowledgments -- $$tIntroduction -- $$t1. "Fundamental" Rights versus State Interests -- $$tI. "I Am Not Talking Very Much Like a Lawyer" -- $$tII. The U.S. Supreme Court and "Fundamental" Rights -- $$tIII. The Liberty and Rights Protected by the Due Process Clause -- $$tCase Study: U.S. v Carolene Products, 1938, Footnote 4³⁶ -- $$tIV. Is There a Protected Liberty Interest for Persons Having Intimate Homosexual Relations? -- $$tCase Study: Bowers v Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)⁵º -- $$tCase Study: Roy Romer, Governor v Richard Evans, et al., 1996⁵⁴ -- $$tV. The Limits of Sexual Privacy -- $$tVI. Summing Up -- $$t2. Marriage and Marital Privacy -- $$tI. "I Should Like to Suggest a Substantial Change for Your Consideration" -- $$tII. Heterosexual Marriage -- $$tCase Study: Skinner v Oklahoma, 1942⁴¹ -- $$tIII.Molecular Changes in the Definition and Reality of the Traditional Marital Relationship -- $$tCase Study: Griswold v Connecticut, 1965⁵º -- $$tIV. The Dilemma of Intimate Violence and Congressional Passage of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), 1994 -- $$tCase Study: Joshua DeShaney, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, et al., v Winnebago County,Wisconsin Department of Social Services, et al., 1988⁵⁹ -- $$tCase Study: U.S. v Morrison, 1999⁷⁵ -- $$tV. Same-Sex Marriage -- $$tCase Study: Stan Baker, et al. v State of Vermont, et al., 1999⁹⁴ -- $$tVI. Congressional Passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 1996 -- $$tCase Study: Nina Baehr v Miike, 1996, 1999¹º³ -- $$tVII. Summing Up -- $$t3. The "Rhapsody of the Unitary Family"¹ -- $$tI. "Something Smells about This Case" -- $$tII. Who Is Family? -- $$tCase Study: Village of Belle Terre v. Bruce Boraas, 1974²³ -- $$tIII. Family Privacy Rights versus State Interests -- $$tCase Study: Reynolds v U.S., 1878²⁸ -- $$tCase Study: Michael H. v Gerald D., 1989 -- $$tIV. Family Privacy Rights versus Personal Autonomy and Other Constitutional Rights -- $$tCase Study: Eisenstadt v Baird, 1971 -- $$tV. Summing Up -- $$t4. Motherhood or Not, That Is Her Decision -- $$tI. "I Will Be God-damned!"³ -- $$tII. Not Having Children: Abortion as Personal Right -- $$tCase Study: Roe v Wade, 1972¹¹ -- $$tIII. After Roe, What Are the Limits of "State Actions" That Regulate the Abortion Procedure? -- $$tCase Study: Webster v Reproductive Health Services, 1989 -- $$tIV. After Roe, What Are a Husband's Rights? -- $$tCase Study: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 1992 -- $$tVI. Back into the Vortex: The "Partial Birth" Abortion Controversy -- $$tCase Study: Stenberg v Carhart, 1999 -- $$tVII. Summing Up -- $$t5. Raising the Child "Father Knows Best"? -- $$tI. "This Is Really a Ridiculous Case to Be Absorbing Our Time" -- $$tII. Raising and Educating Children -- $$tCase Study: Wisconsin v Yoder, 1972 -- $$tIII. The Mental and Physical Health and Welfare of the Child -- $$tCase Study: Parham v J.R., 1979 -- $$tCase Study: Ingraham v Wright, 1977 -- $$tIV. Children's Rights: Visiting the Grandparents -- $$tCase Study: Troxel v Granville, 2000 -- $$tV. Summing Up -- $$t6. "Let Me Go!" -- $$tI. "This Case Should Never Have Been Started" -- $$tII. Terminating Life Support for an Incompetent Family Member: Passive Euthanasia -- $$tCase Study: Cruzan v Director,Missouri Department of Health, 1990 -- $$tIII. Physician-Assisted Suicide: Active Euthanasia -- $$tCase Study:Washington State v Glucksberg, 1997; Vacco v Quill, 1997 -- $$tIV. Summing Up -- $$t7. Family and Personal Privacy in the Twenty-First Century -- $$tI. "She Kept Screaming" -- $$tII. Is the Home Still a Castle? -- $$tCase Study: Kyello v U.S., 2000 -- $$tIII. The "Medical Necessity" Exception and Federal Anti-Marijuana-Use Law -- $$tIV. Summing Up -- $$tNotes -- $$tBibliography -- $$tIndex -- $$tAbout the Author 001479556 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users. 001479556 520__ $$aChoice Outstanding Academic Title 2003 Personal rights, such as the right to procreate-or not-and the right to die generate endless debate. This book maps out the legal, political, and ethical issues swirling around personal rights. Howard Ball shows how the Supreme Court has grappled with the right to reproduce and to abort, and takes on the issue of auto-euthanasia and assisted suicide, from Karen Ann Quinlan through Kevorkian and just recently to the Florida case of the woman who was paralyzed by a gunshot from her mother and who had the plug pulled on herself. For the last half of the twentieth century, the justices of the Supreme Court have had to wrestle with new and difficult life and death questions for them as well as for doctors and their patients, medical ethicists, sociologists, medical practitioners, clergy, philosophers, law makers, and judges. The Supreme Court in the Intimate Lives of Americans offers a look at these issues as they emerged and examines the manner in which the men and women of the U.S. Supreme Court addressed them. 001479556 538__ $$aMode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. 001479556 546__ $$aIn English. 001479556 5880_ $$aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 18. Sep 2023) 001479556 650_0 $$aAbortion$$xLaw and legislation$$zUnited States$$xHistory. 001479556 650_0 $$aHuman reproduction$$xLaw and legislation$$zUnited States$$xHistory. 001479556 650_0 $$aRight to die$$xLaw and legislation$$zUnited States$$xHistory. 001479556 650_4 $$aLAW / Civil Rights$$2sh. 001479556 655_0 $$aElectronic books 001479556 77308 $$iTitle is part of eBook package:$$dDe Gruyter$$tNew York University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013$$z9783110706444 001479556 7760_ $$cprint$$z9780814798621 001479556 852__ $$bebk 001479556 85640 $$3De Gruyter$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780814723012$$zOnline Access 001479556 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1479556$$pGLOBAL_SET 001479556 912__ $$a978-3-11-070644-4 New York University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013$$c2000$$d2013 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_BACKALL 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_CL_LAEC 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_EBACKALL 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_EBKALL 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_ECL_LAEC 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_EEBKALL 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_ESSHALL 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_ESTMALL 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_PPALL 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_SSHALL 001479556 912__ $$aEBA_STMALL 001479556 912__ $$aGBV-deGruyter-alles 001479556 912__ $$aPDA11SSHE 001479556 912__ $$aPDA12STME 001479556 912__ $$aPDA13ENGE 001479556 912__ $$aPDA17SSHEE 001479556 912__ $$aPDA18STMEE 001479556 912__ $$aPDA5EBK 001479556 980__ $$aBIB 001479556 980__ $$aEBOOK 001479556 982__ $$aEbook 001479556 983__ $$aOnline