The Supreme Court and Election Law : Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore / Richard Hasen.
Hasen, Richard, author.
2006
KF4886
Available Online

Linked e-resources

Linked Resource
Online Access

Details

Title
The Supreme Court and Election Law : Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore / Richard Hasen.
Author
Hasen, Richard, author.
ISBN
9780814744536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814744536.001.0001
Published
New York, NY : : New York University Press, [2006]
Copyright
©2006
Language
English
Language Note
In English.
Description
1 online resource
Item Number
10.18574/nyu/9780814744536.001.0001 doi
Call Number
KF4886
Dewey Decimal Classification
342.7307
Summary
In the first comprehensive study of election law since the Supreme Court decided Bush v. Gore, Richard L. Hasen rethinks the Court's role in regulating elections. Drawing on the case files of the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist courts, Hasen roots the Court's intervention in political process cases to the landmark 1962 case, Baker v. Carr. The case opened the courts to a variety of election law disputes, to the point that the courts now control and direct major aspects of the American electoral process.The Supreme Court does have a crucial role to play in protecting a socially constructed "core" of political equality principles, contends Hasen, but it should leave contested questions of political equality to the political process itself. Under this standard, many of the Court's most important election law cases from Baker to Bush have been wrongly decided.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
System Details Note
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
Digital File Characteristics
text file PDF
Source of Description
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 18. Sep 2023)
In
New York University Press Backlist eBook-Package 2000-2013
Available in Other Form
print 9780814736593
Linked Resources
Online Access
Record Appears in
Online Resources > Ebooks
All Resources
Frontmatter
Contents
Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction: Mighty Platonic Guardians
1. The Supreme Court of Political Equality
2. Judicial Unmanageability and Political Equality
3. Protecting the Core of Political Equality
4. Deferring to Political Branches on Contested Equality Claims
5. Equality, Not Structure
Conclusion: Political Equality and a Minimalist Court
Appendix 1: Twentieth-Century Election Law Cases Decided by the Supreme Court in a Written Opinion
Appendix 2: Justice Goldberg's Proposed Dissent to a Per Curiam Summary Affirmance in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections
Notes
Index
About the Author

Browse Subjects

Show more subjects...

Statistics

from
to
Export