@article{1479981,
      author = {Bandes, Susan A.,  and Calhoun, Cheshire,  and Fleming,  James E.,  and Frazer, Michael L.,  and Griswold, Charles  L.,  and Kersch, Ken I.,  and Krause, Sharon R.,  and  Marcus, George E.,  and Meyler, Bernadette,  and Prinz,  Jesse J.,  and Sanger, Carol,  and West, Robin,  and  Zipursky, Benjamin C., },
      url = {http://library.usi.edu/record/1479981},
      title = {Passions and Emotions : NOMOS LIII /},
      abstract = {Throughout the history of moral, political, and legal  philosophy,many have portrayed passions and emotions as  beingopposed to reason and good judgment. At the same  time,others have defended passions and emotions as  temperingreason and enriching judgment, and there is  mountingempirical evidence linking emotions to moral  judgment. InPassions and Emotions, a group of prominent  scholars inphilosophy, political science, and law explore  three clustersof issues: "Passion & Impartiality: Passions  & Emotions inMoral Judgment"; "Passion & Motivation:  Passions & Emotionsin Democratic Politics"; and "Passion &  Dispassion:Passions & Emotions in Legal Interpretation."  This timely,interdisciplinary volume examines many of the  theoreticaland practical legal, political, and moral issues  raised by suchquestions.},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814760147.001.0001},
      recid = {1479981},
      pages = {1 online resource},
}