Go to main content
Formats
Format
BibTeX
MARCXML
TextMARC
MARC
DublinCore
EndNote
NLM
RefWorks
RIS

Linked e-resources

Details

Intro
C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con
Copyright
Dedication
Contents
EDITORIAL FOREWORD
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION: OXFORD'S BONNY APOLOGIST
ONE: Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's Argument from Desire
TWO: Con: Quenching the Argument from Desire
THREE: Reply to Gregory Bassham
FOUR: Reply to Peter Williams
FIVE: Pro: The Argument from Reason Defended
SIX: Con: Naturalism Undefeated
SEVEN: Reply to David Kyle Johnson
EIGHT: Reply to Victor Reppert
NINE: Pro: The Moral Argument is Convincing
TEN: Con: A Critique of the Moral Argument
ELEVEN: Reply to Erik Wielenberg
TWELVE: Reply to David Baggett
THIRTEEN: Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's "Trilemma"
FOURTEEN: Con: Lewis's Trilemma: Case Not Proven
FIFTEEN: Reply to Adam Barkman
SIXTEEN: Reply to Donald Williams
SEVENTEEN: Pro: The Problem of Pain Defended
EIGHTEEN: Con: C. S. Lewis on Evil: At Best a Likely Story
NINETEEN: Reply to David L. O'Hara
TWENTY: Reply to Philip Tallon
WORKS CITED
THE CONTRIBUTORS
INDEX.

Browse Subjects

Show more subjects...

Statistics

from
to
Export