001553218 001__ 1553218
001553218 005__ 20240711003217.0
001553218 02470 $$ahttps://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2023.285$$2DOI
001553218 037__ $$aIR
001553218 041__ $$aeng
001553218 245__ $$aLet’s Talk: Critical Participatory Action Research and Improvement Science-Guided Research Comparing Our Approaches to Improve Education
001553218 269__ $$a2023-04-26
001553218 520__ $$aThe purpose of this paper is to identify key characteristics and forms that both research approaches use within
the applied field of education. In this paper, we ask—how are CPAR and IS-GR similar and different? And, can
tools or propositions from each be used in tandem within a research project? We invite readers to consider
useful frameworks created to address problems of practice. Drawing strength from our diverse backgrounds
(fields of study and professional roles), we aim to identify clear overlaps and divergent perspectives between
the two approaches to aid scholarly practitioners in making informed decisions about the research frameworks
they choose to take up to address pressing problems of practice in education.
001553218 6531_ $$acritical participatory
001553218 6531_ $$aaction research
001553218 6531_ $$aimprovement science
001553218 6531_ $$aeducational research
001553218 7001_ $$aHoward, Joy$$uWestern Carolina University$$1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1850-1455
001553218 7001_ $$aDerk, Kimberly$$uUniversity of Southern Indiana
001553218 7001_ $$aColson, Tori$$uUniversity of Southern Indiana
001553218 773__ $$tImpacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice
001553218 8564_ $$9cb24a53c-d89e-42e6-81ae-4f7d6208ce2e$$s444200$$uhttps://library.usi.edu/record/1553218/files/Let%E2%80%99s%2BTalk-Approaches%2Bto%2BImprove%2BEducation%2B9-17%2Brevised%20%281%29.pdf
001553218 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:1553218$$pGLOBAL_SET
001553218 980__ $$aMANUSCRIPT