Creating a more perfect Slaveholders' Union : slavery, the Constitution, and secession in antebellum America / Peter Radan.
2023
KF4613
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Details
Title
Creating a more perfect Slaveholders' Union : slavery, the Constitution, and secession in antebellum America / Peter Radan.
Author
ISBN
9780700635825 (ebook)
0700635823 (ebook)
9780700635801 (cloth)
9780700635818 (paperback)
0700635823 (ebook)
9780700635801 (cloth)
9780700635818 (paperback)
Published
Lawrence : University Press of Kansas, [2023]
Copyright
©2023
Language
English
Description
1 online resource (xxviii, 424 pages).
Call Number
KF4613
Alternate Call Number
LAW060000 HIS036050
Dewey Decimal Classification
342.7304/2
Summary
"In 1869, in Texas v White, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the unilateral secession of a state from the Union was unconstitutional because the Constitution created "an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible states." This meant that once a state became part of the Union, "[t]here was no place for reconsideration, or revocation, except through revolution, or through consent of the states." In this iconoclastic work, Peter Radan demonstrates why the court's ruling was wrong and why, on the basis of American constitutional law in 1860-1861, the unilateral secessions of the Confederate States were lawful on the grounds that the United States was forged as a "Slaveholders' Union." Creating a more perfect Slaveholders' Union deals with two constitutional issues: first, whether the states in 1860 had a right to secede from the Union, and second, what significance slavery had in defining the constitutional Union. The two matters came together when the states seceded on the grounds that the system of government the Confederate States had agreed to-namely, a system of human enslavement-had been violated by the incoming Republican administration. The legitimacy of this secession was anchored, as Radan shows, in the compact theory of the Constitution, which held that, because the Constitution was a compact between the member states of the Union, breaches of its fundamental provisions gave affected states the right to unilaterally secede from the Union. In so doing the Confederate States sought to preserve and protect their peculiar institution by forming a more perfect Slaveholders' Union"-- Provided by publisher.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Source of Description
Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
Series
Constitutional thinking.
Available in Other Form
Linked Resources
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
"An irrepressible conflict" : slavery and the Union's territorial expansion
"An indestructible Union" : nationalist and compact theories of the Constitution
"A peculiar species of property" : the Constitution and slavery
"The constitutional compact has been deliberately broken" : constitutional breaches and the legal justification of secession
The final word.
"An indestructible Union" : nationalist and compact theories of the Constitution
"A peculiar species of property" : the Constitution and slavery
"The constitutional compact has been deliberately broken" : constitutional breaches and the legal justification of secession
The final word.