What Roe v. Wade should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision / edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin.
Balkin, J. M.
2005
KF228.R59 W47 2005 (Mapit)
Available at General Collection

Items

Details

Title What Roe v. Wade should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision / edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin.
ISBN 0814799183 (alk. paper)
Imprint New York : New York University Press, c2005.
Language English
Description xiii, 288 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
Call Number KF228.R59 W47 2005
Dewey Decimal Classification 342.7308/4
Bibliography, etc. Note Includes bibliographical references (p. 267-273) and index.
Added Author Balkin, J. M.
Linked Resources Table of contents
Record Appears in On-Campus Resources > Books
All Resources
Part I. Introduction. Roe v. Wade: an engine of controversy / Jack M. Balkin
Part II. Revised opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton. Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court)
Reva Siegel (concurring)
Mark Tushnet (concurring)
Anita Allen (concurring in the judgment)
Jed Rubenfeld (concurring in the judgment except as to Doe)
Robin West (concurring in the judgment)
Cass Sunstein (concurring in the judgment)
Akhil Amar (concurring in Roe, dissenting in Doe)
Jeffrey Rosen (dissenting)
Teresa Stanton Collett (dissenting)
Michael Stokes Paulsen (dissenting)
Photo appendix to the opinion of Michael Stokes Paulsen
Comments from the contributors
Appendix: The constitution of the United States of America: selected provisions.

Browse Subjects

Show more subjects...

Statistics

from
to
Export