000324559 000__ 01632cam\a2200337\a\4500
000324559 001__ 324559
000324559 005__ 20210513120508.0
000324559 008__ 071017s2008\\\\enk\\\\\\b\\\\001\0\eng\\
000324559 010__ $$a  2007043079
000324559 020__ $$a9780195307795 (alk. paper)
000324559 020__ $$a0195307798 (alk. paper)
000324559 035__ $$a(OCoLC)ocn176861326
000324559 035__ $$a324559
000324559 040__ $$aDLC$$cDLC$$dBAKER$$dBTCTA$$dYDXCP$$dC#P
000324559 043__ $$an-us---
000324559 049__ $$aISEA
000324559 05000 $$aKF9668$$b.D47 2008
000324559 08200 $$a345.73/056$$222
000324559 1001_ $$aDershowitz, Alan M.
000324559 24510 $$aIs there a right to remain silent? :$$bcoercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 /$$cAlan M. Dershowitz.
000324559 260__ $$aOxford ;$$aNew York :$$bOxford University Press,$$c2008.
000324559 300__ $$axx, 212 p. ;$$c22 cm.
000324559 440_0 $$aInalienable rights series
000324559 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [177]-204) and index.
000324559 5050_ $$aWhat is the right against self-incrimination? -- The Supreme Court's recent decision -- The limits of textual analysis in constitutional interpretation -- The limits of precedent: which way does the "immunity" analogy cut? -- The limits of historical inquiry -- The privilege over time -- The relevance of constitutional policies underlying the right -- A matter of interpretation -- Conclusion: The case for a vibrant privilege in the preventive state.
000324559 61010 $$aUnited States.$$tConstitution.$$n5th Amendment.
000324559 61010 $$aUnited States.$$bSupreme Court.
000324559 650_0 $$aSelf-incrimination$$zUnited States.
000324559 650_0 $$aRight to counsel$$zUnited States.
000324559 650_0 $$aPolice questioning$$zUnited States.
000324559 650_0 $$aCivil rights$$zUnited States.
000324559 85200 $$bgen$$hKF9668$$i.D47$$i2008
000324559 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:324559$$pGLOBAL_SET
000324559 980__ $$aBIB
000324559 980__ $$aBOOK