Rethinking the ethics of clinical research [electronic resource] : widening the lens / Alan Wertheimer.
2010
R724 .W37 2010eb
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Details
Title
Rethinking the ethics of clinical research [electronic resource] : widening the lens / Alan Wertheimer.
Author
ISBN
9780199813285 (electronic bk.)
9780199743513
0199743517
9780199743513
0199743517
Published
Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.
Language
English
Description
1 online resource (ix, 356 pages)
Call Number
R724 .W37 2010eb
Dewey Decimal Classification
174.2/8
Summary
Clinical research requires that some people be used and possibly harmed for the benefit of others. What justifies such use of people? This book provides an in-depth philosophical analysis of several crucial issues raised by that question. Much writing on the ethics of research with human subjects assumes that participation in research is a distinctive activity that requires distinctive moral principles. In most contexts, we allow people to choose the activities in which they engage. By contrast, people are permitted to participate in research only after Institutional Review Boards determine that it is appropriate for them to do so. Although we assume that consent to participate in research must be preceded by an elaborate disclosure of information, we make no such assumption in many other areas of life. Although it is thought to be morally problematic to provide financial inducements to prospective subjects, we make no such assumptions when we hire people as loggers, fishermen, and fire fighters. Although we readily accept the "off-shoring" of manufacturing, many regard the off-shoring of medical research with great skepticism. This book seeks to widen the lens through which we consider such issues. When we do so, we will find that many standard principles of research ethics are difficult to defend. The book first argues that because respect for "autonomy" has been a central tenet of research ethics, many have failed to recognize that the structure of the regulation of research is deeply paternalistic and have therefore failed to justify such paternalism. The book then rejects "the autonomous authorization" model that characterizes most writing in bioethics and argues for a "fair transaction" model. Although many worry that the use of financial payment to recruit research subjects is coercive or constitutes an undue inducement, the book argues that most of those worries are misplaced. Shifting its attention to research in developing societies, the book considers the claim that international researchers exploit research abroad often exploits its subjects. Finally, the book considers the claim that because researchers benefit from their use of research subjects, they acquire special obligations to them or their communities.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Source of Description
Description based on print version record.
Available in Other Form
Linked Resources
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
Introduction
Facing up to paternalism in research ethics
Preface to a theory of consent transactions in research : beyond valid consent
Should we worry about money?
Exploitation in clinical research
The interaction principle.
Facing up to paternalism in research ethics
Preface to a theory of consent transactions in research : beyond valid consent
Should we worry about money?
Exploitation in clinical research
The interaction principle.