000439027 000__ 03201cam\a2200421Ia\4500
000439027 001__ 439027
000439027 005__ 20211203140344.0
000439027 006__ m\\\\\\\\u\\\\\\\\
000439027 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000439027 008__ 120605s2010\\\\ncu\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000439027 010__ $$z2010010140
000439027 020__ $$a9780807899373 (electronic bk.)
000439027 020__ $$z9780807834121
000439027 035__ $$a(OCoLC)ocn676697257
000439027 035__ $$a(CaPaEBR)ebr10425405
000439027 040__ $$aCaPaEBR$$cCaPaEBR
000439027 05014 $$aKF4550$$b.S74 2010eb
000439027 08204 $$a342.73$$222
000439027 1001_ $$aStein, Marc.
000439027 24510 $$aSexual injustice$$h[electronic resource] :$$bSupreme Court decisions from Griswold to Roe /$$cMarc Stein.
000439027 260__ $$aChapel Hill :$$bUniversity of North Carolina Press,$$c2010.
000439027 300__ $$a1 online resource (xiii, 364 p.)
000439027 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000439027 5050_ $$aIntroduction -- Part 1: Decisions and doctrines.  Liberalization's limits from Griswold to Roe ; Consistent conservatism in Boutilier --Part 2: Activists and advocates.   Liberalization's lawyers ; Boutilier's defenders ; Boutilier's defense -- Part 3: Reading and readers.  Remembering Griswold to Roe ; Forgetting Boutilier -- Epilogue.
000439027 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000439027 520__ $$a"The U.S. Supreme Court of the 1960s and 1970s is typically celebrated by liberals and condemned by conservatives for its rulings on abortion, birth control, and other sexual matters. In this new work, historian Marc Stein demonstrates convincingly that both sides have it wrong. Focusing on six major Supreme Court cases, Stein examines the more liberal rulings on birth control, abortion, interracial marriage, and obscenity in Griswold, Fanny Hill, Loving, Eisenstadt, and Roe alongside a profoundly conservative ruling on homosexuality in Boutilier.  In the same era in which the Court recognized special marital, reproductive, and heterosexual rights and privileges, it also upheld an immigration statute that classified homosexuals as "psychopathic personalities." How, then, did Americans come to believe that the Court supported the sexual revolution? Stein shows that a diverse set of influential journalists, judges, and scholars translated the Court's language about marital and reproductive rights into bold statements about sexual freedom and equality. Creatively researched and persuasively argued, this book not only provides the first in-depth account of Boutilier, one of the Court's earliest gay rights cases, but also will change the way we think about the Supreme Court and the sexual revolution."--pub. desc.
000439027 588__ $$aDescription based on print version record.
000439027 61010 $$aUnited States.$$bSupreme Court.
000439027 650_0 $$aConstitutional law$$zUnited States$$vCases.
000439027 650_0 $$aSex and law$$zUnited States$$vCases.
000439027 650_0 $$aGays$$xLegal status, laws, etc.$$zUnited States$$vCases.
000439027 650_0 $$aGay rights$$zUnited States$$vCases.
000439027 650_0 $$aHomosexuality$$xLaw and legislation$$zUnited States$$vCases.
000439027 655_7 $$aElectronic books.$$2lcsh
000439027 77608 $$iPrint version:$$aStein, Marc.$$tSexual injustice.$$dChapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press, 2010$$z9780807834121$$w(DLC) 2010010140$$w(OCoLC)558673820
000439027 8520_ $$bacq
000439027 85280 $$bebk$$hProquest Ebook Central
000439027 85640 $$3ProQuest Ebook Central$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/usiricelib-ebooks/detail.action?docID=605940$$zOnline Access
000439027 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:439027$$pGLOBAL_SET
000439027 980__ $$aEBOOK
000439027 980__ $$aBIB
000439027 982__ $$aEbook
000439027 983__ $$aOnline