000470641 000__ 01556cam\a2200325\i\4500
000470641 001__ 470641
000470641 005__ 20210513163831.0
000470641 008__ 120612s2013\\\\mdua\\\\\b\\\\001\0\eng\\
000470641 010__ $$a  2012021731
000470641 020__ $$a9780810885745$$qpbk.$$qalk. paper
000470641 020__ $$a0810885743$$qpbk.$$qalk. paper
000470641 035__ $$a(OCoLC)ocn795575195
000470641 035__ $$a470641
000470641 040__ $$aDLC$$beng$$erda$$cDLC$$dYDX$$dBTCTA$$dYDXCP$$dCDX$$dBWX$$dOKN$$dSTF$$dOCLCQ$$dOCLCF
000470641 042__ $$apcc
000470641 049__ $$aISEA
000470641 05000 $$aLB2333$$b.G58 2013
000470641 08200 $$a378.1/2$$223
000470641 1001_ $$aGould, Thomas H. P.,$$d1953-2016.
000470641 24510 $$aDo we still need peer review? :$$ban argument for change /$$cThomas H.P. Gould.
000470641 260__ $$aLanham :$$bThe Scarecrow Press, Inc.,$$c2013.
000470641 300__ $$axii, 175 pages :$$billustrations ;$$c23 cm
000470641 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000470641 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000470641 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000470641 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000470641 5050_ $$aWhat is peer review and why do we need it? -- Early peer review -- Peer review 1600-1950 -- Anonymous, double-blind peer review -- The rise of the Internet, the supremacy of the individual -- Recent suggested solutions -- Option one : eliminate peer review (partially and totally) -- Can we review ourselves? -- Private industry and academic associations solve it all (but are tenure committees left holding the bag?) -- The future of peer review : what have we lost and what can we gain?
000470641 650_0 $$aCollege teachers$$xRating of.
000470641 650_0 $$aPeer review.
000470641 650_0 $$aScholarly publishing.
000470641 85200 $$bgen$$hLB2333$$i.G58$$i2013
000470641 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:470641$$pGLOBAL_SET
000470641 980__ $$aBIB
000470641 980__ $$aBOOK