@article{695515,
      recid = {695515},
      author = {Donkin, Susan,},
      title = {Preventing terrorism and controlling risk a comparative  analysis of control orders in the UK and Australia /  [electronic resource] :},
      pages = {1 online resource (xv, 89 pages) :},
      abstract = {This Brief takes a provocative look at existing  socio-legal literature with a comparative study of  terrorism control orders, focusing on how the concept of  pre-emption fits within a traditional criminological  framework. This timely work examines how such measures  might be conceived and interpreted within a situational  crime prevention approach. Over the past decade,  socio-legal scholars have identified a rise in pre-emptive  control mechanisms to respond to terrorism and other  threats in the post-9/11 world. Many have argued that this  pre-emptive rationale has been used to justify the  introduction of measures that transcend established legal  and risk frameworks, to deal with individuals or groups  thought to pose a threat to the state or its citizens.  Preventing Terrorism and Controlling Risk: A Comparative  Analysis of Control Orders in the UK and Australia will be  of interest to researchers in Criminology and Criminal  Justice, particularly with a focus on terrorism, risk  assessment, and human rights.},
      url = {http://library.usi.edu/record/695515},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8705-0},
}