000723915 000__ 05180cam\a2200565Ii\4500
000723915 001__ 723915
000723915 005__ 20230306140405.0
000723915 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000723915 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000723915 008__ 141103t20142015sz\a\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000723915 019__ $$a908089917
000723915 020__ $$a9783319109572$$qelectronic book
000723915 020__ $$a331910957X$$qelectronic book
000723915 020__ $$z9783319109565
000723915 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-319-10957-2$$2doi
000723915 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn894243165
000723915 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)894243165$$z(OCoLC)908089917
000723915 040__ $$aGW5XE$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cGW5XE$$dN$T$$dYDXCP$$dOCLCQ$$dWAU$$dOCLCF$$dEBLCP
000723915 049__ $$aISEA
000723915 050_4 $$aQH91.75.A1
000723915 08204 $$a333.7$$223
000723915 1001_ $$aCaveen, Alex,$$eauthor.
000723915 24514 $$aThe controversy over marine protected areas$$h[electronic resource] :$$bscience meets policy /$$cAlex Caveen, Nick Polunin, Tim Gray, Selina Marguerite Stead.
000723915 264_1 $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c[2014]
000723915 264_4 $$c©2015
000723915 300__ $$a1 online resource (xix, 162 pages) :$$billustrations (some color).
000723915 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000723915 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000723915 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000723915 4901_ $$aSpringerBriefs in Environmental Science,$$x2191-5547
000723915 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000723915 5050_ $$aAcknowledgements; Executive Summary ; Contents; List of Abbreviations; List of Figures; List of Tables; Chapter 1; Introduction; 1.1 The NP Argument; 1.1.1 Empirical Dimension; 1.1.2 Normative Dimension; 1.2 The Social Conservationist Argument; 1.2.1 Empirical Dimension; 1.2.2 Normative Dimension; 1.3 Growth of MPAs; 1.4 Structure of the Book; The Rise and Rise of the Marine Reserves 'Bandwagon'; Chapter 2; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Policy Networks; 2.2.1 Epistemic Community; 2.2.2 Advocacy Coalitions; 2.3 Conclusion; Bibliometric Test of the MR 'Bandwagon'; Chapter 3; 3.1 Introduction
000723915 5058_ $$a3.2 Methods3.2.1 Social Network Analysis; 3.2.2 Citation Analysis; 3.3 Results and Discussion; 3.4 Conclusion; Chapter 4; Bias in the Peer-reviewed Literature, and Crossing the Science/Policy Divide; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Pro-MR Bias; 4.2.1 Methods; 4.2.2 Results and Discussion; Journal Editor and Reviewer Bias; Author Self-Censorship; 4.3 The Science/Policy Divide; 4.3.1 The Linear Model; 4.3.2 The Deliberative Model; 4.3.3 Is Scientific Advocacy of MRs Acceptable?; 4.4 Conclusion; Chapter 5; Critique of the Scientific Evidence for Fisheries Benefits of MRs; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Methods
000723915 5058_ $$a5.2.1 Data Collection5.2.2 Literature Classification; 5.3 Results; 5.3.1 Empirical Studies; Number of Empirical Studies; Type of MPA Studied; Ecosystems and Habitats Studied; Main Groups of Species Studied; Empirical Research Effort per Marine Province; 'Quality' of Empirical Field Studies; 5.3.2 Theoretical Studies; 5.4 Discussion; 5.4.1 Drawbacks of Targets; 5.4.2 Skewed Focus of Literature; 5.4.3 Mixed Evidence; 5.4.4 Difficulties of Enforcement; 5.5 Conclusion; Chapter 6; Case Study of the 'English Patient'; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 Sources of Data; 6.3 Results and Discussion
000723915 5058_ $$a6.3.1 Planning Work Preceding MCAA Drafting (1999-2006)6.3.2 Planning of MCZs (2006-present); Controversy over the Objectives of MCZs; Controversy over Data Deficiencies; Controversy Over Time-Scales; Controversy Over Consultation; Controversy Over Equity; 6.3.3 The Outcome of the MCZ Site Selection Process; 6.4 Conclusion; Chapter 7; Conclusion; 7.1 Introduction; 7.2 Summary; 7.3 Wider Implications; 7.3.1 Role of Politics in the MR Debate; 7.3.2 Role of Scientific Advocacy in the MR Debate; 7.3.3 Role of Stakeholders in the MR Debate; 7.3.4 Role of Caution in the MR Debate
000723915 5058_ $$a7.3.5 Reconciliation Between NP and SC7.4 Conclusion; References; Index
000723915 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000723915 520__ $$aThis book is a critical analysis of the concept of marine protected areas (MPAs) particularly as a tool for marine resource management. It explains the reasons for the extraordinary rise of MPAs to the top of the political agenda for marine policy, and evaluates the scientific credentials for the unprecedented popularity of this management option. The book reveals the role played by two policy networks - epistemic community and advocacy coalition - in promoting the notion of MPA, showing how advocacy for marine reserves by some scientists based on limited evidence of fisheries benefits has led.
000723915 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed November 1, 2014).
000723915 650_0 $$aMarine parks and reserves.
000723915 650_0 $$aMarine parks and reserves$$xLaw and legislation.
000723915 7001_ $$aPolunin, Nick,$$eauthor.
000723915 7001_ $$aGray, Tim,$$eauthor.
000723915 7001_ $$aStead, Selina Marguerite,$$eauthor.
000723915 77608 $$iPrint version:$$aCaveen, Alex$$tThe Controversy over Marine Protected Areas : Science meets Policy$$dCham : Springer International Publishing,c2014$$z9783319109565
000723915 830_0 $$aSpringerBriefs in environmental science.
000723915 852__ $$bebk
000723915 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-10957-2$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000723915 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:723915$$pGLOBAL_SET
000723915 980__ $$aEBOOK
000723915 980__ $$aBIB
000723915 982__ $$aEbook
000723915 983__ $$aOnline
000723915 994__ $$a92$$bISE