Contracts of adhesion between law and economics [electronic resource] : rethinking the unconscionability doctrine / Elena D'Agostino.
2015
KF808
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Concurrent users
Unlimited
Authorized users
Authorized users
Document Delivery Supplied
Can lend chapters, not whole ebooks
Details
Title
Contracts of adhesion between law and economics [electronic resource] : rethinking the unconscionability doctrine / Elena D'Agostino.
Author
ISBN
9783319131146 electronic book
3319131141 electronic book
9783319131139
3319131141 electronic book
9783319131139
Published
Cham : Springer, 2015.
Language
English
Description
1 online resource.
Item Number
10.1007/978-3-319-13114-6 doi
Call Number
KF808
Dewey Decimal Classification
346.73
Summary
This book examines the most controversial issues concerning the use of pre-drafted clauses in fine print, which are usually included in consumer contracts and presented to consumers on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. By applying a multi-disciplinary approach that combines consumer?s psychology and seller?s drafting power in the logic of efficiency and good faith, the book provides a fresh and unconventional analysis of the existing literature, both theoretical and empirical. Moving from the unconscionability doctrine, it criticizes (and in some cases refutes) its main conclusions based on criteria which are usually invoked to sustain the need for public intervention to protect consumers, and specifically related to Law (contract complexity), Psychology (consumer lack of sophistication criterion) and Economics (market structure criterion). It also analyzes the effects of different regulations, such as banning vexatious clauses or mandating disclosure clauses, showing that none of them protect consumers, but in fact prove to be harmful when consumers are more vulnerable, that is whenever sellers can exploit some degree of market power. In closing, the book combines these disparate aspects, arguing that the solution (if any) to the problem of consumer exploitation and market inefficiency associated with the use of contracts of adhesion in these contexts cannot be found in removing or prohibiting hidden clauses, but instead has to take into account the effects of these clauses on the contract as a whole.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Source of Description
Online resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed January 16, 2015).
Series
SpringerBriefs in law.
Available in Other Form
Print version: 9783319131139
Linked Resources
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
1. The Unconscionability Doctrine in a Law & Economics Perspective
2. Market structure
3. Lack of sophistication
4. Voluntary Disclosure of Clauses
5. Public Intervention
6. Concluding remarks.
2. Market structure
3. Lack of sophistication
4. Voluntary Disclosure of Clauses
5. Public Intervention
6. Concluding remarks.