Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements; Contents; List of Participants; Part I Introduction; Ages of Stars: Methods and Uncertainties; 1 Why Care About Ages?; 2 Ages for Galactic Studies; 2.1 The Solar Neighborhood; 2.2 The Galaxy as a Whole; 3 Methods for Solar-Type Stars; 3.1 Rotation and Activity; 3.2 Isochrone Placement; 3.3 Asteroseismology; 4 Age-Dating Evolved Stars; 5 Prospects for Improvements; References; Solar-Like Oscillating Stars as Standard Clocks and Rulers for Galactic Studies; 1 Introduction; 2 Harvesting Data for Ensemble Seismology; 3 From Precise to Accurate Clocks and Rulers; 4 Summary
1.1 Pre-main Sequence Evolution1.2 Main-Sequence Evolution; 1.3 Post-main Sequence Evolution; 2 Asteroseismic Studies of Red-Giant Stars; 2.1 Mixed Modes in the Red Giant KIC 8366239; 2.2 Mixed Modes in the Red Giant KIC 7341231; 2.3 Rotational Splittings for a Large Sample of Red Giants; Conclusion; References; Open Clusters: Probes of Galaxy Evolution and Bench Tests of Stellar Models; 1 Introduction; 2 White Dwarfs; 2.1 Initial-Final Mass Relation; 2.2 WD Ages; 3 Rotation; References; Exploiting the Open Clusters in the Kepler and CoRoT Fields; 1 Introduction
2 Tests of Asteroseismic Scaling Relations3 Identification of Stars That Evolved Through Non-standard Evolution; Conclusions; References; Part III Photospheric Constraints and Reports on Ongoing Spectroscopic Surveys (e.g. GESS, APOGEE, GALAH); Photometric Stellar Parameters for Asteroseismology and Galactic Studies; 1 Introduction; 2 Photometric Stellar Parameters; 3 Seismic Stellar Parameters; 4 A Match Made in Heaven; Conclusions and Future Perspectives; References; Spectroscopic Constraints for Low-Mass Asteroseismic Targets; 1 Introduction; 2 The Samples Discussed
3 Adopting the Seismic Gravity in Spectroscopic Analyses3.1 Impact on the Determination of the Other Parameters; 3.2 The Ambiguity Surrounding the Best Metallicity Value; 4 A Step Beyond the Determination of the Basic Parameters: The Detailed Chemical Composition; 5 Some Perspectives; References; Preliminary Evaluation of the Kepler Input Catalog Extinction Model Using Stellar Temperatures; 1 Introduction; 2 Comparison of Photometric and Spectroscopic Temperatures; 2.1 Impact of Extinction?; 3 Revision of the KIC Extinctions; 3.1 RJCE Extinctions; 3.2 Extinction Map Comparison; 3.3 Results
1.1 Pre-main Sequence Evolution1.2 Main-Sequence Evolution; 1.3 Post-main Sequence Evolution; 2 Asteroseismic Studies of Red-Giant Stars; 2.1 Mixed Modes in the Red Giant KIC 8366239; 2.2 Mixed Modes in the Red Giant KIC 7341231; 2.3 Rotational Splittings for a Large Sample of Red Giants; Conclusion; References; Open Clusters: Probes of Galaxy Evolution and Bench Tests of Stellar Models; 1 Introduction; 2 White Dwarfs; 2.1 Initial-Final Mass Relation; 2.2 WD Ages; 3 Rotation; References; Exploiting the Open Clusters in the Kepler and CoRoT Fields; 1 Introduction
2 Tests of Asteroseismic Scaling Relations3 Identification of Stars That Evolved Through Non-standard Evolution; Conclusions; References; Part III Photospheric Constraints and Reports on Ongoing Spectroscopic Surveys (e.g. GESS, APOGEE, GALAH); Photometric Stellar Parameters for Asteroseismology and Galactic Studies; 1 Introduction; 2 Photometric Stellar Parameters; 3 Seismic Stellar Parameters; 4 A Match Made in Heaven; Conclusions and Future Perspectives; References; Spectroscopic Constraints for Low-Mass Asteroseismic Targets; 1 Introduction; 2 The Samples Discussed
3 Adopting the Seismic Gravity in Spectroscopic Analyses3.1 Impact on the Determination of the Other Parameters; 3.2 The Ambiguity Surrounding the Best Metallicity Value; 4 A Step Beyond the Determination of the Basic Parameters: The Detailed Chemical Composition; 5 Some Perspectives; References; Preliminary Evaluation of the Kepler Input Catalog Extinction Model Using Stellar Temperatures; 1 Introduction; 2 Comparison of Photometric and Spectroscopic Temperatures; 2.1 Impact of Extinction?; 3 Revision of the KIC Extinctions; 3.1 RJCE Extinctions; 3.2 Extinction Map Comparison; 3.3 Results