000726223 000__ 04551cam\a2200493Ii\4500
000726223 001__ 726223
000726223 005__ 20230306140719.0
000726223 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000726223 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000726223 008__ 150326t20152015sz\\\\\\ob\\\\000\0\eng\d
000726223 020__ $$a9783319170589$$qelectronic book
000726223 020__ $$a3319170589$$qelectronic book
000726223 020__ $$z9783319170572
000726223 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9$$2doi
000726223 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn905649763
000726223 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)905649763
000726223 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dN$T$$dGW5XE$$dBTCTA$$dE7B$$dCOO$$dYDXCP$$dOCLCF$$dVLB
000726223 049__ $$aISEA
000726223 050_4 $$aHV6049$$b.S53 2015eb
000726223 08204 $$a364.3$$223
000726223 1001_ $$aShapiro, David L.,$$eauthor.
000726223 24510 $$aRisk assessment$$h[electronic resource] :$$borigins, evolution, and implications for practice /$$cDavid L. Shapiro, Angela M. Noe.
000726223 264_1 $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c[2015]
000726223 264_4 $$c©2015
000726223 300__ $$a1 online resource.
000726223 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000726223 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000726223 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000726223 4901_ $$aSpringerBriefs in psychology. Behavioral criminology
000726223 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references.
000726223 5050_ $$aChapter 1: Origins -- The MacArthur Foundation Research on Risk Assessment -- The Supposed Roles of Mental Illness -- Case Example -- Predicting Sexual Re-Offending -- Chapter 2: Assessment Instruments -- Psychopathology Checklist -- Revised (PCL-R) -- Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) -- Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) -- Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (DVRAG) -- Static-99 -- Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offender Recidivism (RRASOR) -- Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool -- Revised (MnSOST-R) -- Structured Professional Judgement -- Historical, Clinical, Risk Management -- 20 (HCR-20) -- Sexual Violence Risk -- 20 (SVR-20) -- Spousal Assault Risk Appraisal Guide (SARA) -- Observations and Limitations -- Chapter 3: Clinical Practice.- Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976).- McIntosh v. Milano (1979).- Shaw v. Glickman (1980).- Thompson v. Alameda County (1979).- Hedlund v. The Superior Court of Orange County (1983).- Brady v. Hopper (1983).- Davis v. Lhim (1983).- Peck v. Counseling Services of Addison County (1985).- White v. United States (1986).- Currie v. United States (1986).- Nasser v. Parker (1995).- Sage v. United States (1997).- Jablonski v. United States (1983).- Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck (1980).- Williamson v. Liptzin (2000).- Ewing v. Goldstein (2004) -- Chapter 4: Conclusions.
000726223 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000726223 520__ $$aThis compact reference makes the case for a middle ground between clinical and actuarial methods in predicting future violence, domestic violence, and sexual offending. It critiques widely used measures such as the PCL-R, VRAG, SORAG, and Static-99 in terms of clarity of scoring, need for clinical interpretation, and potential weight in assessing individuals. Appropriate standards of practice are illustrated--and questioned--based on significant legal cases, among them Tarasoff v.Regents of the State of California and Lipari v. Sears, that have long defined the field. This expert coverage helps make sense of the pertinent issues and controversies surrounding risk assessment as it provides readers with invaluable information in these and other key areas: The history of violence prediction. Commonly used assessment instruments with their strengths and limitations. Psychological risk factors, both actual and questionable. Clinical lessons learned from instructive court cases, from Tarasoff forward. Implications for treatment providers. How more specialized risk assessment measures may be developed. Risk Assessment offers its readers--professionals working with sex offenders as well as those working with the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide and Sex Offender Appraisal Guide--new possibilities for rethinking the assessment strategies of their trade toward predicting and preventing violent criminal incidents.
000726223 588__ $$aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed March 27 2015).
000726223 650_0 $$aRecidivism.
000726223 650_0 $$aRisk assessment.
000726223 650_0 $$aCrime prevention.
000726223 7001_ $$aNoe, Angela M.,$$eauthor.
000726223 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z9783319170572
000726223 830_0 $$aSpringerBriefs in psychology.$$pBehavioral criminology.
000726223 852__ $$bebk
000726223 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000726223 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:726223$$pGLOBAL_SET
000726223 980__ $$aEBOOK
000726223 980__ $$aBIB
000726223 982__ $$aEbook
000726223 983__ $$aOnline
000726223 994__ $$a92$$bISE