000733750 000__ 04731cam\a2200445Ii\4500
000733750 001__ 733750
000733750 005__ 20230306141102.0
000733750 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000733750 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000733750 008__ 150827s2015\\\\sz\a\\\\ob\\\\000\0\eng\d
000733750 020__ $$a9783319217598$$qelectronic book
000733750 020__ $$a3319217593$$qelectronic book
000733750 020__ $$z9783319217581
000733750 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-319-21759-8$$2doi
000733750 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn919252340
000733750 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)919252340
000733750 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dYDXCP$$dGW5XE$$dN$T$$dIDEBK$$dDKU$$dCOO$$dOCLCF$$dOCLCQ$$dAZU
000733750 043__ $$ae------
000733750 049__ $$aISEA
000733750 050_4 $$aKJE5132
000733750 08204 $$a342.408/5$$223
000733750 1001_ $$aKorenica, Fisnik,$$eauthor.
000733750 24514 $$aThe EU accession to the ECHR$$h[electronic resource] :$$bbetween Luxembourg's search for autonomy and Strasbourg's credibility on human rights protection /$$cFisnik Korenica.
000733750 264_1 $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c2015.
000733750 300__ $$a1 online resource (xix, 471 pages) :$$billustrations.
000733750 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000733750 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000733750 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000733750 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references
000733750 5050_ $$aPart I: The EU as a Sui Generis Human Rights Law Organization: Situating the Roots of the Accession Question: 1. Introduction to the Book -- 2. EU Becoming a Human Rights Law Organization: Starting from Nowhere with a ?Gouvernment des Juges? -- 3. EU Law Autonomy: Where Does the Viewpoint for ?Competition? of Luxembourg Start from? -- Part II: The Draft Accession Agreement of the EU Accession to the ECHR: an Examination of the Central Mechanisms in Light of EU Law Peculiarities -- 4. A New Start for the Accession of the EU to the ECHR -- 5. Status of ECHR and DAA in EU Legal Order -- 6. Attribution of Liability Under the Co-respondent Mechanism -- 7. Inter-Party Mechanism and the EU: Possible Implications from the Strasbourg?s Jurisdiction? -- 8. EU Prior Involvement Review -- Part III: A Strasbourg Perspective on Applications of EU Law Origin -- 9. Testing the Co-respondent Mechanism from the Strasbourg Court Perspective: Three Distinctive Cases with Three Distinctive Scenarios -- 10. Admissibility Before the Strasbourg Court: An Outlook on the EU Law Originated Applications -- Part IV: Approaching the Final ?Station? -- 11. Before the Conclusion: Luxembourg Court?s Opinion 2/13 on the DAA?s Compatibility with the EU Treaties -- 12. An Overall Conclusion.
000733750 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000733750 520__ $$aThis book examines the EU accession to the ECHR from a systemic perspective as well as from the specific perspective of the 2013 draft accession agreement negotiated between the relevant body of the Council of Europe and the EU Commission. It mainly follows a legal positivist approach to examining the nature and scope of obligations that will regulate the new relationship between EU law and European Convention on Human Rights law, concentrating specifically on the issue of jurisdictional interface between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts. The book offers an in-depth examination of the core mechanisms of the draft accession agreement, taking into account the remarks in Luxembourg's Opinion 2/13, focusing especially on the issue of attribution of responsibility when a violation of ECHR has been jointly committed by the EU and its Member States, the inter-party procedure and the prior involvement mechanism. The work basically argues that EU accession to the ECHR will have a constitutional impact on the EU legal order, and may also have certain implications for the jurisdictional interface between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts. It also questions the mode of interaction between some normative aspects of ECHR law and EU law, offering certain arguments as to the interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights and ECHR from overlapping and accommodative perspectives post-accession. The book concludes that with the EU accession to the ECHR - as it stands right now with the draft accession agreement - the macro relationship between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts will change significantly, while their constitutional roles will become vertically accommodated and better specialized.
000733750 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed September 2, 2015).
000733750 63000 $$aConvention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms$$d(1950 November 5)
000733750 650_0 $$aHuman rights$$zEuropean Union countries.
000733750 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z9783319217581
000733750 852__ $$bebk
000733750 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-21759-8$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000733750 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:733750$$pGLOBAL_SET
000733750 980__ $$aEBOOK
000733750 980__ $$aBIB
000733750 982__ $$aEbook
000733750 983__ $$aOnline
000733750 994__ $$a92$$bISE