000753037 000__ 03282cam\a2200529Ii\4500
000753037 001__ 753037
000753037 005__ 20230306141536.0
000753037 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000753037 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000753037 008__ 151218s2016\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\000\0\eng\d
000753037 019__ $$a935250602
000753037 020__ $$a9783319243764$$q(electronic book)
000753037 020__ $$a3319243764$$q(electronic book)
000753037 020__ $$z9783319243740
000753037 020__ $$a3319243748
000753037 020__ $$a9783319243740
000753037 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn932622566
000753037 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)932622566$$z(OCoLC)935250602
000753037 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dYDXCP$$dIDEBK$$dN$T$$dCDX$$dNUI$$dOCLCF$$dEBLCP$$dDEBSZ$$dCOO$$dBEDGE
000753037 043__ $$an-us---
000753037 049__ $$aISEA
000753037 050_4 $$aK1188.A7
000753037 08204 $$a341.7566505$$223
000753037 1001_ $$aBleyen, Lief,$$eauthor.
000753037 24510 $$aJudicial sales of ships$$h[electronic resource] :$$ba comparative study /$$cLief Bleyen.
000753037 264_1 $$aCham ;$$aNew York :$$bSpringer,$$c[2016]
000753037 264_4 $$c©2016
000753037 300__ $$a1 online resource.
000753037 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000753037 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000753037 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000753037 4901_ $$aHamburg studies on maritime affairs ;$$vvolume 36
000753037 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references.
000753037 5050_ $$aIntroduction -- Existing international and European legal framework for judicial sales of ships -- Comparative analysis: Belgium -- Comparative analysis: The Netherlands -- Comparative analysis: England and Wales -- Comparative analysis: Summary -- International legal framework for recognition of foreign judicial sales of ships -- Main conclusions.
000753037 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000753037 520__ $$aThis work focuses on a specific aspect of the enforcement of maritime claims, namely judicial sales of ships, a procedure creditors typically resort to in the event of an irreversible default situation. A substantial part of the book approaches the topic from a comparative perspective, the goal being to assess the similarities and differences of the judicial sale procedure between three specific jurisdictions: Belgium, the Netherlands, and England & Wales. In this study, the comparison is used to further analyse the impacts of these differences on the effectiveness and reliability of the judicial sale procedure in each jurisdiction and also forms the basis for assessing the feasibility of harmonising judicial sale procedures and fostering their acceptance. Considering the international character typical of judicial sales of ships, conflict-of-law questions are very likely to arise during these procedures. Accordingly, the comparative study, where appropriate, is viewed against a private international law background.
000753037 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (viewed January 4, 2016).
000753037 650_0 $$aJudicial sales.
000753037 650_0 $$aArrest of ships.
000753037 650_0 $$aMerchant marine.
000753037 650_0 $$aMaritime law.
000753037 77608 $$iPrint version:$$aBleyen, Lief$$tJudicial Sales of Ships : A Comparative Study$$dCham : Springer International Publishing,c2015$$z9783319243740
000753037 830_0 $$aHamburg studies on maritime affairs ;$$vv. 36.
000753037 852__ $$bebk
000753037 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-24376-4$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000753037 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:753037$$pGLOBAL_SET
000753037 980__ $$aEBOOK
000753037 980__ $$aBIB
000753037 982__ $$aEbook
000753037 983__ $$aOnline
000753037 994__ $$a92$$bISE