000753435 000__ 04875cam\a2200469Mu\4500
000753435 001__ 753435
000753435 005__ 20230306141558.0
000753435 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000753435 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000753435 008__ 160123s2016\\\\si\a\\\\ob\\\\000\0\eng\d
000753435 019__ $$a935272997
000753435 020__ $$a9789811002571$$q(electronic book)
000753435 020__ $$a9811002576$$q(electronic book)
000753435 020__ $$z9789811002564
000753435 020__ $$z9811002568
000753435 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn935920675
000753435 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)935920675$$z(OCoLC)935272997
000753435 040__ $$aEBLCP$$beng$$cEBLCP$$dN$T$$dCDX$$dAZU$$dYDXCP$$dIDEBK$$dOCLCF$$dCOD$$dCOO$$dOCL
000753435 049__ $$aISEA
000753435 050_4 $$aHB71
000753435 08204 $$a330
000753435 1001_ $$aKawanaka, Takeshi,$$eauthor.
000753435 24510 $$aPolitical determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies$$h[electronic resource] /$$cTakeshi Kawanaka, Yasushi Hazama.
000753435 264_1 $$aSingapore :$$bSpringer Singapore,$$c[2016].
000753435 264_4 $$c©2016.
000753435 300__ $$a1 online resource (ix, 112 pages) :$$bcolor illustrations
000753435 4901_ $$aSpringerBriefs in Economics
000753435 500__ $$aDescription based upon print version of record.
000753435 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000753435 5050_ $$aPreface; Contents; About the Authors; 1 Introduction; Abstract; 1.1 Statement of the Research Question; 1.2 Previous Arguments; 1.3 Theory: Three Determinants of Variations in Emerging Democracies; 1.4 Significance of the Study; 1.5 Structure of the Book; References; 2 Theory; Abstract; 2.1 Multidimensional Preferences; 2.2 Political Market Failure; 2.3 State Capacity; 2.4 Limitation of Class-Based Coalitions in Emerging Democracies; 2.5 Other Variables; References; 3 The State of Emerging Democracies; Abstract; 3.1 Trends of Inequality; 3.2 Three Variables and Inequality; References; 4 Multidimensionality and Preferences for Income EqualityAbstract; 4.1 Conceptualizing Multidimensionality and Redistribution Preferences; 4.2 Research Design; 4.2.1 Dependent Variable; 4.2.2 Individual-Level Independent Variables; Sociodemographic Variables; Attitudinal Variables; 4.2.3 Country-Level Independent Variables; 4.2.4 Estimation Model; 4.3 Results; References; 5 Political Determinants of Income Inequality: Panel Analysis; Abstract; 5.1 Conceptualization: Political Market and State Capacity; 5.1.1 Political Market: Programmatic Competition and Political Kuznets Curve; 5.1.2 State Capacity: Corruption's Kuznets Curve5.2 Research Design; 5.2.1 Data and Samples; 5.2.2 Panel Design; 5.2.3 Variables; Dependent Variable; Political Market; State Capacity; Ethnic Peace; Control Variables; 5.3 Results; 5.3.1 Political Market; 5.3.2 State Capacity; 5.3.3 Ethnic Peace; 5.3.4 Control Variables; 5.3.5 Robustness Check; 6 Conclusion; Abstract; Index
000753435 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000753435 520__ $$aThis study explores why democratization does not necessarily result in inequality reduction in emerging democracies and reveals the determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies, where the average level of inequality continues to be higher and where there is a larger variance of inequality levels than in advanced democracies. Apart from economic, demographic, and social factors, the book highlights political factors that obstruct redistributive policies. In contrast to conventional studies on advanced democracies, which emphasize the relations between different classes, this study asserts that several political factors cause malfunctioning of democratic institutions at various phases of the political process in emerging democracies: multidimensional preferences, the failure of the political market, and weak state capacity. The book employs econometric methods to examine the effects of these political factors. The results indicate their significant effects. The multilevel analysis using the World Values Survey demonstrates that multidimensional preferences, operationalized as ethnic fractionalization, weaken demand for income inequality. Political market quality and state capacity are measured by the age of the largest opposition party, and the Quality of Government indicator is used for the unbalanced panel analysis covering the 1985-2012 period for 75 democracies. Both political market quality and state capacity reduce inequality, but the latter takes more time to show its effect.
000753435 650_0 $$aEconomics$$xPolitical aspects.
000753435 650_0 $$aIncome distribution$$xPolitical aspects.
000753435 650_0 $$aNew democracies.
000753435 7001_ $$aHazama, Yasushi,$$d1961-$$eauthor.
000753435 77608 $$iPrint version:$$aKawanaka, Takeshi$$tPolitical Determinants of Income Inequality in Emerging Democracies$$dSingapore : Springer Singapore,c2016$$z9789811002564
000753435 830_0 $$aSpringerBriefs in economics.
000753435 85280 $$bebk$$hSpringerLink
000753435 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-0257-1$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000753435 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:753435$$pGLOBAL_SET
000753435 980__ $$aEBOOK
000753435 980__ $$aBIB
000753435 982__ $$aEbook
000753435 983__ $$aOnline
000753435 994__ $$a92$$bISE