000760827 000__ 04875cam\a2200445Ii\4500
000760827 001__ 760827
000760827 005__ 20230306142126.0
000760827 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000760827 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000760827 008__ 160426s2016\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000760827 020__ $$a9783319283715$$q(electronic book)
000760827 020__ $$a3319283715$$q(electronic book)
000760827 020__ $$z9783319283692
000760827 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn947837347
000760827 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)947837347
000760827 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dYDXCP$$dIDEBK$$dN$T$$dAZU$$dOCLCO$$dCDX$$dEBLCP$$dOCLCF$$dOCLCO$$dSNK
000760827 049__ $$aISEA
000760827 050_4 $$aK3165
000760827 08204 $$a342.001$$223
000760827 24500 $$aDemocratizing constitutional law :$$bperspectives on legal theory and the legitimacy of constitutionalism /$$cThomas Bustamante, Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes, editors.
000760827 264_1 $$a[Cham]  :$$bSpringer,$$c[2016]
000760827 300__ $$a1 online resource.
000760827 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000760827 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000760827 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000760827 4901_ $$aLaw and philosophy library ;$$vvolume 113
000760827 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000760827 5050_ $$aI Challenging and Defending Judicial Review -- 1. Randomized Judicial Review; Andrei Marmor -- 2. On the Difficulty to Ground the Authority of Constitutional Courts: Can Strong Judicial Review be Morally Justified?; Thomas Bustamante -- 3. The Reasons without Vote: The Representative and Majoritarian Function of Constitutional Courts; Luís Roberto Barroso -- II Constitutional Dialogues and Constitutional Deliberation -- 4. Decoupling Judicial Review From Judicial Supremacy; Stephen Gardbaum -- 5. Scope and limits of dialogic constitutionalism; Roberto Gargarella -- 6. A Defence of a Broader Sense of Constitutional Dialogues based on Jeremy Waldron's Criticism on Judicial Review; Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes -- III Institutional Alternatives for Constitutional Changes -- 7. New Institutional Mechanisms for Making Constitutional Law; Mark Tushnet -- 8. Democratic Constitutional Change: Assessing Institutional Possibilities; Christopher Zurn -- 9. The Unconstitutionality of Constitutional Changes in Colombia: a Tension between Majoritatian and Constitutional Democracy; Gonzalo Ramírez Cleves -- IV Constitutional Promises and Democratic Participation -- 10. Is there such thing as a radical constitution?; Vera Karam de Chueiri -- 11. Judicial reference to community values -- A pointer towards constitutional juries?; Eric Ghosh -- V Legal Theory and Constitutional Interpretation -- 12. Common Law Constitutionalism and the Written Constitution; Wil Waluchow and Katharina Stevens -- 13. On how law is not like chess -- Dworkin and the theory of conceptual types; Ronaldo Porto Macedo Júnior. .
000760827 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000760827 520__ $$aThis volume critically discusses the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism. It does so with a view to respond to objections raised by legal and political philosophers who are sceptical of judicial review based on the assumption that judicial review is an undemocratic institution. The book builds on earlier literature on the moral justification of the authority of constitutional courts, and on the current attempts to develop a system on ℓ́ℓweak judicial reviewℓ́ℓ. Although different in their approach, the chapters all focus on devising institutions, procedures and, in a more abstract way, normative conceptions to democratize constitutional law. These democratizing strategies may vary from a radical objection to the institution of judicial review, to a more modest proposal to justify the authority of constitutional courts in their ℓ́ℓdeliberative performanceℓ́ℓ or to create constitutional juries that may be more aware of a communityℓ́ℓs constitutional morality than constitutional courts are. The book connects abstract theoretical discussions about the moral justification of constitutionalism with concrete problems, such as the relation between constitutional adjudication and deliberative democracy, the legitimacy of judicial review in international institutions, the need to create new institutions to democratize constitutionalism, the connections between philosophical conceptions and constitutional practices, the judicial review of constitutional amendments, and the criticism on strong judicial review.
000760827 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (viewed May 5, 2016).
000760827 650_0 $$aConstitutional law$$xPhilosophy.
000760827 650_0 $$aConstitutional law.
000760827 7001_ $$aBustamante, Thomas da Rosa de,$$d1976-$$eeditor.
000760827 7001_ $$aFernandes, Bernardo Gonçalves,$$eeditor.
000760827 830_0 $$aLaw and philosophy library ;$$vv. 113.
000760827 852__ $$bebk
000760827 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-28371-5$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000760827 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:760827$$pGLOBAL_SET
000760827 980__ $$aEBOOK
000760827 980__ $$aBIB
000760827 982__ $$aEbook
000760827 983__ $$aOnline
000760827 994__ $$a92$$bISE