000763160 000__ 02432cam\a2200469Ii\4500
000763160 001__ 763160
000763160 005__ 20230306142256.0
000763160 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000763160 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000763160 008__ 160829s2016\\\\nyu\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000763160 019__ $$a957607768$$a957740238$$a958413182$$a961939476
000763160 020__ $$a9781137567635$$q(electronic book)
000763160 020__ $$a1137567635$$q(electronic book)
000763160 020__ $$z9781137567628
000763160 020__ $$z1137567627
000763160 0243_ $$a9781137567628
000763160 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn957490915
000763160 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)957490915$$z(OCoLC)957607768$$z(OCoLC)957740238$$z(OCoLC)958413182$$z(OCoLC)961939476
000763160 037__ $$a10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5$$b00676990
000763160 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dN$T$$dYDX$$dCOO$$dEBLCP$$dOCLCF$$dCSAIL$$dVT2
000763160 043__ $$an-us---
000763160 049__ $$aISEA
000763160 050_0 $$aKF9731
000763160 08204 $$a344.7303/56$$223
000763160 1001_ $$aSmith, Christopher E.,$$eauthor.
000763160 24514 $$aThe Supreme Court and the development of law :$$bthrough the prism of prisoners' rights /$$cChristopher E. Smith.
000763160 264_1 $$aNew York :$$bPalgrave Macmillan,$$c[2016]
000763160 300__ $$a1 online resource.
000763160 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000763160 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000763160 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000763160 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000763160 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000763160 5208_ $$aThis text illuminates the decision-making processes of the US Supreme court through an examination of several prisoners' rights cases. In 1964, the Supreme Court declined to hear prisoners' claims about religious freedom. In 2014, the Supreme Court heard a case that led to the justices' unanimous endorsement of a Muslim prisoner's religious right to grow a beard despite objections from prison officials. In the 50-year span between those two events, the Supreme Court developed the law concerning rights for imprisoned offenders. As demonstrated in this book, the factors that shape Supreme Court decision making are well-illustrated by prisoners' rights cases.
000763160 61010 $$aUnited States.$$bSupreme Court.
000763160 650_0 $$aPrisoners$$xLegal status, laws, etc.$$zUnited States$$vCases.
000763160 650_0 $$aPrisoners$$xCivil rights.
000763160 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z1137567627$$z9781137567628$$w(OCoLC)945979243
000763160 852__ $$bebk
000763160 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-56763-5$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000763160 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:763160$$pGLOBAL_SET
000763160 980__ $$aEBOOK
000763160 980__ $$aBIB
000763160 982__ $$aEbook
000763160 983__ $$aOnline
000763160 994__ $$a92$$bISE