Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Preface; Contents; Introduction; 1 Part I: Processing Information About Candidates/Voting Correctly; 2 Part II: Processing Information About How Others Voters Vote: Impact on the Decision to Vote or to Abstain; 3 Part III: Processing Information About How Others Voters Vote: The Impact of Polls on Candidate Choice; 4 Part IV: Methodological Debate and Innovations; 5 The Future of Voting Experiments; References; Part I: Processing Information About Candidates/Voting Correctly; Deciding Correctly: Variance in the Effective Use of Party Cues; 1 Theoretical Perspectives
1.1 Party Labels as Information Shortcuts1.2 Theoretical Differences in the Effective Use of Party Labels; 1.3 The Canadian Context; 2 Experimental Design; 3 Recalling and Predicting Candidate Stances; 4 Voting Correctly; 5 Conclusion; Appendix; References; The Company Makes the Feast. Party Constellations, Campaign Context and Issue Voting in Multi-party Systems; 1 Introduction; 2 Issue Considerations and Vote Choice; 3 Issue Voting and Partisanship in Multi-party Systems; 4 The Moderating Effect of the Campaign Context; 5 Experimental Design; 6 Measurement; 7 Analysis
7.1 Issue Information, Cross-Pressure, and the Campaign Context7.2 Alternative Pathways: Reinforcement or Affirmation?; 8 Conclusion and Discussion; References; Candidate Extremity, Information Environments, and Affective Polarization: Three Experiments Using Dynamic Process Tracing; 1 The New Media Environment and Affective Polarization; 2 Hypotheses; 3 Method; 4 Study 1: Elite Political Polarization; 4.1 Key Manipulations; 4.2 Results; 5 Study 2: News Environment Diversity; 5.1 Key Manipulation; 5.2 Results; 6 Study 3: Media Polarization in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
6.1 Key Manipulations6.2 Results; 7 Discussion; References; Common Knowledge and Voter Coordination: Experimental Evidence from Mali; 1 Introduction; 2 Information and Voter Coordination; 2.1 Social Voting and Coordination; 2.2 Public Information and Voting; 3 Institutional Context; 4 Research Design; 4.1 Treatment: A Civics Course; 4.2 Sample; 4.3 Compliance; 4.4 Data; 5 Data Analysis; 6 Discussion; References; Part II: Impact of Polls on the Decision to Vote or to Abstain; Are People More or Less Inclined to Vote When Aggregate Turnout Is High?; 1 Introduction; 2 The Experimental Design
3 The FindingsAppendix 1: Instructions; Appendix 2: Conformity Questions; References; Visibility and Sanctions: The Social Norm of Voting in the Lab; 1 Introduction; 2 Voting as a Social Norm; 3 Research Design, Protocol and Data; 3.1 The Experimental Design; 3.2 Data, Variables and Estimation Method; 4 Results and Analysis; 4.1 Aggregate-Level Results: The Effects of Visibility and Sanctions; 4.2 Individual-Level Results: The Use and Impact of Sanctions; 5 Conclusion; Appendix: Order of the Actions That Take Place Throughout the Experiment in Each of the Eight Groups; References
1.1 Party Labels as Information Shortcuts1.2 Theoretical Differences in the Effective Use of Party Labels; 1.3 The Canadian Context; 2 Experimental Design; 3 Recalling and Predicting Candidate Stances; 4 Voting Correctly; 5 Conclusion; Appendix; References; The Company Makes the Feast. Party Constellations, Campaign Context and Issue Voting in Multi-party Systems; 1 Introduction; 2 Issue Considerations and Vote Choice; 3 Issue Voting and Partisanship in Multi-party Systems; 4 The Moderating Effect of the Campaign Context; 5 Experimental Design; 6 Measurement; 7 Analysis
7.1 Issue Information, Cross-Pressure, and the Campaign Context7.2 Alternative Pathways: Reinforcement or Affirmation?; 8 Conclusion and Discussion; References; Candidate Extremity, Information Environments, and Affective Polarization: Three Experiments Using Dynamic Process Tracing; 1 The New Media Environment and Affective Polarization; 2 Hypotheses; 3 Method; 4 Study 1: Elite Political Polarization; 4.1 Key Manipulations; 4.2 Results; 5 Study 2: News Environment Diversity; 5.1 Key Manipulation; 5.2 Results; 6 Study 3: Media Polarization in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
6.1 Key Manipulations6.2 Results; 7 Discussion; References; Common Knowledge and Voter Coordination: Experimental Evidence from Mali; 1 Introduction; 2 Information and Voter Coordination; 2.1 Social Voting and Coordination; 2.2 Public Information and Voting; 3 Institutional Context; 4 Research Design; 4.1 Treatment: A Civics Course; 4.2 Sample; 4.3 Compliance; 4.4 Data; 5 Data Analysis; 6 Discussion; References; Part II: Impact of Polls on the Decision to Vote or to Abstain; Are People More or Less Inclined to Vote When Aggregate Turnout Is High?; 1 Introduction; 2 The Experimental Design
3 The FindingsAppendix 1: Instructions; Appendix 2: Conformity Questions; References; Visibility and Sanctions: The Social Norm of Voting in the Lab; 1 Introduction; 2 Voting as a Social Norm; 3 Research Design, Protocol and Data; 3.1 The Experimental Design; 3.2 Data, Variables and Estimation Method; 4 Results and Analysis; 4.1 Aggregate-Level Results: The Effects of Visibility and Sanctions; 4.2 Individual-Level Results: The Use and Impact of Sanctions; 5 Conclusion; Appendix: Order of the Actions That Take Place Throughout the Experiment in Each of the Eight Groups; References