Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Preface; Contents; Abbreviations; Part I General Articles; 1 Assessing the Usefulness and Legitimacy of CAS ; Abstract ; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 The Role of International Federations; 1.3 The Behaviour of Supporters of the Accused; 1.4 Future Directions; 2 The Influence of Common Law Traditions on the Practice and Procedure Before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ; Abstract ; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 The Origins of Common Law and Its Historical Development; 2.3 The Modern Influence of Common Law on Legal Thinking and the Principle of Stare Decisis; 2.4 The CAS and Its Procedure
2.4.1 Origins and Historical Development2.4.2 The Reforms of 1994; 2.4.3 The Significance of the Code; 2.5 Common Law or Civil Law?; 2.5.1 Binding or Persuasive Authority?; 2.5.2 The CAS Standard of Proof as an Example of a Practising Common Law Tradition; 2.6 Conclusion; References; 3 The Validity of Analytical Science in Anti-doping-A Scientific and Legal Challenge ; Abstract ; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 The Lallukka CAS Award: The Latest Instalment in the hGH Trilogy; 3.2.1 The Positive Test; 3.2.2 National-Level Proceedings; 3.2.3 CAS Proceedings; 3.2.3.1 The Anti-doping Rule Violation
3.2.3.2 The Sanction3.3 Background of the hGH Trilogy; 3.3.1 Challenges for Anti-doping Science; 3.3.2 The hGH Trilogy Before CAS Panels on the Decision Limits in the Isoform Test; 3.3.3 The hGH Isoform Test After WADA v. Lallukka: A Closed Debate or a Need for Rethinking the System?; 3.4 Attributing a Legal Status to Scientific Issues Under the WADA Code Regime; 3.4.1 Threshold Substance, Non-threshold Substance, or….?; 3.4.2 What Legal Implications Do the Decision Limits Have in Practice?; 3.4.3 Need for Adapting the Legal Framework to Evolving Realities?
3.5 Expert Evidence Before CAS Panels3.5.1 Importance of Expert Evidence in Doping Disputes; 3.5.2 Who Acts as an Expert Before CAS?; 3.5.3 Assessing Expert Evidence; 3.5.4 Pitfalls to Be Avoided in Dealing with Science and Experts; 3.5.5 Financial Aid for Athletes on Scientific Matters?; 3.6 Conclusion-Outlook Beyond 2015; References; 4 The Sell-on Clause in Football: Recent Cases and Evolutions ; Abstract ; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 The Sell-on Clause in Football Transfer Contracts; 4.2.1 Conditions and Peculiarities; 4.2.2 Recent FIFA and CAS Jurisprudence
4.2.2.1 Interpretation Issues: 'Transfer-Transfer Fee'4.2.2.2 Sell-on Clause in Combination with 'Participation Agreement'; 4.3 Case Commentary: CAS 2014A3508-Areas of Dispute; 4.3.1 Factual and Procedural Background; 4.3.2 Decision of the Panel; 4.3.3 Commentary; 4.3.3.1 Interpretation Principles; 4.3.3.2 Aims and Conditions of the Sell-on Clause; 4.3.3.3 The Simulated Transfer; 4.3.3.4 Sell-on Fee-Calculation Basis; 4.4 Sell-on Fees and Third Party Ownership (TPO); 4.5 Conclusion; Reference; 5 CAS Provisional and Conservatory Measures and Other Options to Be Granted Interim Legal Relief
2.4.1 Origins and Historical Development2.4.2 The Reforms of 1994; 2.4.3 The Significance of the Code; 2.5 Common Law or Civil Law?; 2.5.1 Binding or Persuasive Authority?; 2.5.2 The CAS Standard of Proof as an Example of a Practising Common Law Tradition; 2.6 Conclusion; References; 3 The Validity of Analytical Science in Anti-doping-A Scientific and Legal Challenge ; Abstract ; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 The Lallukka CAS Award: The Latest Instalment in the hGH Trilogy; 3.2.1 The Positive Test; 3.2.2 National-Level Proceedings; 3.2.3 CAS Proceedings; 3.2.3.1 The Anti-doping Rule Violation
3.2.3.2 The Sanction3.3 Background of the hGH Trilogy; 3.3.1 Challenges for Anti-doping Science; 3.3.2 The hGH Trilogy Before CAS Panels on the Decision Limits in the Isoform Test; 3.3.3 The hGH Isoform Test After WADA v. Lallukka: A Closed Debate or a Need for Rethinking the System?; 3.4 Attributing a Legal Status to Scientific Issues Under the WADA Code Regime; 3.4.1 Threshold Substance, Non-threshold Substance, or….?; 3.4.2 What Legal Implications Do the Decision Limits Have in Practice?; 3.4.3 Need for Adapting the Legal Framework to Evolving Realities?
3.5 Expert Evidence Before CAS Panels3.5.1 Importance of Expert Evidence in Doping Disputes; 3.5.2 Who Acts as an Expert Before CAS?; 3.5.3 Assessing Expert Evidence; 3.5.4 Pitfalls to Be Avoided in Dealing with Science and Experts; 3.5.5 Financial Aid for Athletes on Scientific Matters?; 3.6 Conclusion-Outlook Beyond 2015; References; 4 The Sell-on Clause in Football: Recent Cases and Evolutions ; Abstract ; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 The Sell-on Clause in Football Transfer Contracts; 4.2.1 Conditions and Peculiarities; 4.2.2 Recent FIFA and CAS Jurisprudence
4.2.2.1 Interpretation Issues: 'Transfer-Transfer Fee'4.2.2.2 Sell-on Clause in Combination with 'Participation Agreement'; 4.3 Case Commentary: CAS 2014A3508-Areas of Dispute; 4.3.1 Factual and Procedural Background; 4.3.2 Decision of the Panel; 4.3.3 Commentary; 4.3.3.1 Interpretation Principles; 4.3.3.2 Aims and Conditions of the Sell-on Clause; 4.3.3.3 The Simulated Transfer; 4.3.3.4 Sell-on Fee-Calculation Basis; 4.4 Sell-on Fees and Third Party Ownership (TPO); 4.5 Conclusion; Reference; 5 CAS Provisional and Conservatory Measures and Other Options to Be Granted Interim Legal Relief