000764075 000__ 02927cam\a2200457Ii\4500
000764075 001__ 764075
000764075 005__ 20230306142358.0
000764075 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000764075 007__ cr\cnunnnunnun
000764075 008__ 160613s2016\\\\nyu\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000764075 019__ $$a961854563
000764075 020__ $$a9781349918911$$q(electronic book)
000764075 020__ $$a1349918911$$q(electronic book)
000764075 020__ $$z9781349918898
000764075 0243_ $$a9781349918898
000764075 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn951623757
000764075 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)951623757$$z(OCoLC)961854563
000764075 037__ $$a10.1057/978-1-349-91891-1$$b00676990
000764075 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dYDXCP$$dN$T$$dAZU$$dCOO$$dLML$$dEBLCP$$dVT2
000764075 043__ $$an-us---
000764075 049__ $$aISEA
000764075 050_4 $$aHD7125
000764075 08204 $$a368.4/3/00973$$223
000764075 1001_ $$aBeechey, Susanne N.,$$eauthor.
000764075 24510 $$aSocial security and the politics of deservingness /$$cSusanne N. Beechey.
000764075 264_1 $$aNew York :$$bPalgrave Macmillan,$$c[2016]
000764075 300__ $$a1 online resource.
000764075 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000764075 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000764075 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000764075 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000764075 5050_ $$aChapter One: Introduction -- Chapter Two: Social Security Today -- Chapter Three: The Politics of Deservingness -- Chapter Four: My Family Member as the Deserving Face of Social Security -- Chapter Five: Challenging the Politics of Deservingness -- Chapter Six: Social Security Tomorrow.
000764075 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000764075 520__ $$aThis book seeks to understand the politics of deservingness for future Social Security reforms through an interpretive policy analysis of the 2005 Social Security privatization debates. What does it mean for politics and policymaking that Social Security recipients are widely viewed as deserving of the benefits they receive? In the 2005 privatization debates, Congress framed Social Security in exclusively positive terms, often in opposition to welfare, and imagined their own beloved family members as recipients. Advocates for private accounts sought to navigate the politics of deservingness by dividing the "we" of social insurance to a "me" of private investment and a "them" of individual rate of return in order to justify the introduction of private accounts into Social Security. Fiscal stress on the program will likely bring Social Security to the policy agenda soon. Understanding the politics of deservingness will be central to navigating those debates. Susanne N. Beechey is Assistant Professor of Politics, Whitman College, USA.
000764075 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (viewed June 12, 2016).
000764075 650_0 $$aSocial security$$xPolitical aspects.
000764075 650_0 $$aSocial security$$xGovernment policy$$zUnited States.
000764075 852__ $$bebk
000764075 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-349-91891-1$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000764075 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:764075$$pGLOBAL_SET
000764075 980__ $$aEBOOK
000764075 980__ $$aBIB
000764075 982__ $$aEbook
000764075 983__ $$aOnline
000764075 994__ $$a92$$bISE