000775343 000__ 03236cam\a2200361Ii\4500
000775343 001__ 775343
000775343 005__ 20210515124408.0
000775343 008__ 160407s2017\\\\nyua\\\\\b\\\\001\0\eng\d
000775343 020__ $$a9781479880287$$q(hardcover)
000775343 020__ $$a1479880280$$q(hardcover)
000775343 035__ $$a(OCoLC)ocn946161367
000775343 035__ $$a775343
000775343 040__ $$aYDXCP$$beng$$erda$$cYDXCP$$dBTCTA$$dBDX$$dOCLCQ$$dCDX$$dGUB$$dGZL$$dIGA$$dOU9$$dFSP$$dABG$$dCOO$$dCNCGM$$dUCL$$dTOH$$dLSD$$dDYJ$$dUPM$$dMBB$$dCPP$$dEMI$$dOCLCF$$dPAU$$dYDX$$dOCLCQ
000775343 043__ $$an-us---
000775343 049__ $$aISEA
000775343 050_4 $$aK3254$$b.T87 2017
000775343 08204 $$a342.7308/53$$223
000775343 1001_ $$aTushnet, Mark V.,$$d1945-$$eauthor.
000775343 24510 $$aFree speech beyond words :$$bthe surprising reach of the First Amendment /$$cMark V. Tushnet, Alan K. Chen, and Joseph Blocher.
000775343 264_1 $$aNew York :$$bNew York University Press,$$c[2017]
000775343 264_4 $$c©2017
000775343 300__ $$avii, 261 pages :$$billustrations ;$$c24 cm
000775343 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000775343 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000775343 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000775343 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 181-253) and index.
000775343 5050_ $$aInstrumental music and the First Amendment -- Art and the First Amendment -- Nonsense and the Freedom of Speech : what meaning means for the First Amendment -- Going further : additional problems and concluding thoughts.
000775343 520__ $$a"The Supreme Court has unanimously held that Jackson Pollock's paintings, Arnold Schöenberg's music, and Lewis Carroll's poem 'Jabberwocky' are 'unquestionably shielded' by the First Amendment. Nonrepresentational art, instrumental music, and nonsense: all receive constitutional coverage under an amendment protecting 'the freedom of speech, ' even though none involves what we typically think of as speech-- the use of words to convey meaning. As a legal matter, the Court's conclusion is clearly correct, but its premises are murky, and they raise difficult questions about the possibilities and limitations of law and expression. Nonrepresentational art, instrumental music, and nonsense do not employ language in any traditional sense, and sometimes do not even involve the transmission of articulable ideas. How, then, can they be treated as 'speech' for constitutional purposes? What does the difficulty of that question suggest for First Amendment law and theory? And can law resolve such inquiries without relying on aesthetics, ethics, and philosophy? Comprehensive and compelling, this book represents a sustained effort to account, constitutionally, for these modes of 'speech.' While it is firmly centered in debates about First Amendment issues, it addresses them in a novel way, using subject matter that is uniquely well suited to the task, and whose constitutional salience has been under-explored. Drawing on existing legal doctrine, aesthetics, and analytical philosophy, three celebrated law scholars show us how and why speech beyond words should be fundamental to our understanding of the First Amendment"--$$cPublisher's website.
000775343 61010 $$aUnited States.$$tConstitution.$$n1st Amendment.
000775343 650_0 $$aFreedom of speech$$vCross-cultural studies.
000775343 650_0 $$aFreedom of speech$$zUnited States.
000775343 7001_ $$aChen, Alan,$$eauthor.
000775343 7001_ $$aBlocher, Joseph,$$eauthor.
000775343 85200 $$bgen$$hK3254$$i.T87$$i2017
000775343 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:775343$$pGLOBAL_SET
000775343 980__ $$aBIB
000775343 980__ $$aBOOK