Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Preface; Acknowledgments; Contents; Editor and Contributors; 1 Influence of Process Parameters on Tensile Strength of Additive Manufactured Polymer Parts Using Taguchi Method; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 2 Experimental Setup; 2.1 Specimen Characteristics; 2.2 Sintering Parameters; 2.3 Equipment Characteristics; 2.4 Design of Experiments; 2.5 Experimental Procedure; 3 Results and Discussion; 4 Analysis of Results; 4.1 Statistical Analysis; 4.2 ANOVA; 4.3 Response Graphs; 5 Prediction of Optimum Performance; 6 Conclusion; References
2 Determination and Comparison of the Anisotropic Strengths of Fused Deposition Modeling P400 ABSAbstract; 1 Introduction; 2 Build Parameter Consideration; 2.1 Layer Resolution; 2.2 Model Interior; 2.3 Support Fill; 2.4 Color; 3 Experimental Setup; 3.1 Tensile Strength Test; 3.2 Compressive Strength Test; 3.3 Izod Impact Strength Test; 3.4 Rockwell Hardness Test; 4 Results; 4.1 Tensile Test; 4.2 Compressive Test; 4.3 Izod Impact Test; 4.4 Rockwell Hardness Test; 5 Conclusion and Future Work; References
3 Estimation of the Effect of Process Parameters on Build Time and Model Material Volume for FDM Process Optimization by Response Surface Methodology and Grey Relational AnalysisAbstract; 1 Introduction; 2 RSM-Based Experimentation; 3 Measurement of Responses; 4 Grey Relational Analysis [10, 15, 16]; 4.1 Data Preprocessing; 4.2 Grey Relational Coefficient and Grey Relational Grade; 4.3 Analysis and Discussion of Experimental Results; 5 Results and Discussion; 6 Conclusions; References; 4 Current Trends of Additive Manufacturing in the Aerospace Industry; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 2 Background
2.1 Additive Manufacturing Application for the Aerospace Industry2.1.1 GE Aviation-Leap Engine Fuel Nozzle Production Using Additive Manufacturing; 2.1.2 SAFRAN R&D Employs Additive Manufacturing for Developing Engine Components and Aircrafts; 2.1.3 NASA Creates Complex Rocket Injector Using Additive Manufacturing; 2.1.4 Additively Manufactured Titanium Component in Airbus A350 XWB; 2.1.5 Fused Deposition Modelling Reduces Tooling Cost and Lead-Time to Produce Composite Aerospace Parts; 2.1.6 Boeing Using 3D Printing Technology
2.1.7 Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Demonstrates Digital Production Innovations2.1.8 Rolls-Royce 3D Prints Largest Component for Trent XWB-97 Engine; 2.1.9 Pratt and Whitney Uses 3D Printing for Aero Engine Parts; 2.1.10 Airbus Defence and Space Used Additive Manufacturing to Reduce Production Time of Satellite Parts; 2.1.11 Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., Used 3D Printing Technology for Aircraft Engine Model; 2.1.12 Research and Development on Laser Metal Deposition Technology at Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL)
2 Determination and Comparison of the Anisotropic Strengths of Fused Deposition Modeling P400 ABSAbstract; 1 Introduction; 2 Build Parameter Consideration; 2.1 Layer Resolution; 2.2 Model Interior; 2.3 Support Fill; 2.4 Color; 3 Experimental Setup; 3.1 Tensile Strength Test; 3.2 Compressive Strength Test; 3.3 Izod Impact Strength Test; 3.4 Rockwell Hardness Test; 4 Results; 4.1 Tensile Test; 4.2 Compressive Test; 4.3 Izod Impact Test; 4.4 Rockwell Hardness Test; 5 Conclusion and Future Work; References
3 Estimation of the Effect of Process Parameters on Build Time and Model Material Volume for FDM Process Optimization by Response Surface Methodology and Grey Relational AnalysisAbstract; 1 Introduction; 2 RSM-Based Experimentation; 3 Measurement of Responses; 4 Grey Relational Analysis [10, 15, 16]; 4.1 Data Preprocessing; 4.2 Grey Relational Coefficient and Grey Relational Grade; 4.3 Analysis and Discussion of Experimental Results; 5 Results and Discussion; 6 Conclusions; References; 4 Current Trends of Additive Manufacturing in the Aerospace Industry; Abstract; 1 Introduction; 2 Background
2.1 Additive Manufacturing Application for the Aerospace Industry2.1.1 GE Aviation-Leap Engine Fuel Nozzle Production Using Additive Manufacturing; 2.1.2 SAFRAN R&D Employs Additive Manufacturing for Developing Engine Components and Aircrafts; 2.1.3 NASA Creates Complex Rocket Injector Using Additive Manufacturing; 2.1.4 Additively Manufactured Titanium Component in Airbus A350 XWB; 2.1.5 Fused Deposition Modelling Reduces Tooling Cost and Lead-Time to Produce Composite Aerospace Parts; 2.1.6 Boeing Using 3D Printing Technology
2.1.7 Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Demonstrates Digital Production Innovations2.1.8 Rolls-Royce 3D Prints Largest Component for Trent XWB-97 Engine; 2.1.9 Pratt and Whitney Uses 3D Printing for Aero Engine Parts; 2.1.10 Airbus Defence and Space Used Additive Manufacturing to Reduce Production Time of Satellite Parts; 2.1.11 Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., Used 3D Printing Technology for Aircraft Engine Model; 2.1.12 Research and Development on Laser Metal Deposition Technology at Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL)