000796181 000__ 06780cam\a2200457Ii\4500
000796181 001__ 796181
000796181 005__ 20230306143354.0
000796181 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000796181 007__ cr\cnunnnunuuu
000796181 008__ 170711s2017\\\\gw\\\\\\ob\\\\000\0\eng\d
000796181 020__ $$a9789462651869$$q(electronic book)
000796181 020__ $$a9462651868$$q(electronic book)
000796181 020__ $$z9789462651852
000796181 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn993432972
000796181 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)993432972
000796181 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dEBLCP$$dN$T$$dFIE$$dOCLCF$$dUAB
000796181 049__ $$aISEA
000796181 050_4 $$aKJE3846.5
000796181 08204 $$a341.242$$223
000796181 1001_ $$aBosters, Thijs,$$eauthor.
000796181 24510 $$aCollective redress and private international law in the EU /$$cThijs Bosters.
000796181 264_1 $$aBerlin, Germany :$$bT.M.C. Asser Press,$$c[2017]
000796181 300__ $$a1 online resource.
000796181 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000796181 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000796181 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000796181 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references.
000796181 5050_ $$aGlossary/Abbreviations; 1 Introduction; Abstract; 1.1 Collective Redress and Cross-Border Mass Disputes; 1.2 Parameters of This Book; 1.3 Book Structure; 1.4 Typologies/Classifications of Collective Redress Mechanisms in the EU; 1.4.1 Public Law Mechanisms and Private Law Mechanisms; 1.4.2 Aggregate Litigation and Representative Litigation; 1.4.2.1 Model or Test Case; 1.4.2.2 Collective Action; 1.4.2.3 Collective Settlement; 1.5 Goals of Collective Redress Mechanisms; 1.5.1 Introduction; 1.5.2 Efficient Legal Protection; 1.5.3 Effective Legal Protection
000796181 5058_ $$a1.5.4 Reduction of the Administrative Burden on the Judiciary1.6 Goals of the Brussels Regulation; 1.6.1 Introduction; 1.6.2 Free Movement of Judgments; 1.6.3 Rights of the Defence; 1.6.4 Legal Certainty; 1.6.5 Resolving a Dispute Before an Appropriate Court; References; Collective Redress Mechanisms in the EU; 2 German KapMuG Procedure; Abstract; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Deutsche Telekom and KapMuG History; 2.3 How a KapMuG Procedure Is Initiated; 2.4 What Plaintiffs Can Achieve Through a KapMuG Procedure; 2.5 Recent Experience with the Act, and Future Developments; References
000796181 5058_ $$a3 Dutch Collective ActionAbstract; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 History of Collective Action; 3.3 Parties That Can Bring a Collective Action?; 3.4 Criteria for Bringing a Collective Action; 3.5 The Result of Bringing a Collective Action; 3.6 Recent Experience with Collective Actions; 3.7 Future Developments; References; 4 Dutch WCAM Procedure; Abstract; 4.1 Collective Settlement History; 4.2 The Conditions for Arranging a WCAM Settlement; 4.3 What Can Eventually Be Achieved with a WCAM Settlement; 4.4 WCAM Case Law; 4.4.1 Dexia Case; 4.4.2 Vedior Case; 4.4.3 Shell Case; 4.4.4 Converium Case
000796181 5058_ $$a4.5 Current and Future Developments4.5.1 Amendments to the WCAM; 4.5.2 Preliminary Questions Supreme Court; References; Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Mass Disputes; 5 Jurisdiction and the KapMuG; Abstract; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Submission; 5.3 Jurisdiction in Consumer-Related Matters; 5.3.1 Application of Chapter II, Section 4 Brussels I-Bis; 5.3.2 Jurisdiction in KapMuG Procedure Relating to Financial Products; 5.4 Choice of Forum Agreement; 5.4.1 Choice of Forum Agreement in Consumer-Related Matters; 5.4.1.1 Choice of Forum Agreement Before the Dispute Arises
000796181 5058_ $$a5.4.1.2 Choice of Forum Agreement After the Dispute Has Arisen5.4.2 Choice of Forum Agreement in Non-Consumer-Related Matters; 5.4.2.1 Choice of Forum Agreement and the Underlying Financial Product; 5.4.2.2 Choice of Forum and the Holding of Shares; 5.4.3 Conclusion; 5.5 General Provision; 5.6 Jurisdiction in Contractual Matters; 5.6.1 Various Places of Performance; 5.7 Jurisdiction in Tortious Matters; 5.7.1 Place Where the Harmful Event Occurred or May Occur; 5.8 Effect of Grounds of Jurisdiction on the Goals of Collective Redress; 5.8.1 Effective Legal Protection
000796181 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000796181 520__ $$aThis book specifically covers issues regarding jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in cross-border mass disputes relating to financial services. Collective redress mechanisms, legal mechanisms which can be used to resolve mass disputes collectively, are growing more important. Due to the global increase in cross-border trade and financial transactions, the number of cross-border mass disputes has increased. In the EU, several prototypes of collective redress mechanism exist that can be used to resolve mass disputes and, aside from the EU’s recommendation on the drafting of laws relating to collective redress, a reevaluation of the Brussels Regulation has also taken place as on 10 January 2015 the Brussels I-bis Regulation replaced the old Brussels Regulation dating from 2000. In spite of a minor reference to collective redress in the Commission proposal, Brussels I-bis does not contain any provision relating to collective redress. As a result, many questions regarding cross-border mass disputes and the relevant private international law issues remain unanswered and unresolved. This book sets out to describe the most important prototypes by referring to actual collective redress mechanisms. In addition, it also sets out how parties to such mass disputes can confer jurisdiction to courts in the EU and what the various pitfalls are. Moreover, the rules concerning the recognition and enforcement of judgments originating from a collective procedure are listed. As cross-border collective redress mechanisms and the rules of private international law to be used in such a context are still being developed, the goals of private international law and the goals of the referred collective redress mechanisms are analysed to provide an insight into how these sets of rules should and could be employed. This book is primarily aimed at researchers, practitioners and lawmakers actively involved in and/or professionally interested in the field of private international law and collective redress mechanisms and should prove very useful in providing them with a greater in-depth understanding of the issues at hand. Thijs Bosters is a law clerk at the Dutch Supreme Court. Prior to his work at the Supreme Court, he was an attorney-at-law with NautaDutilh in The Netherlands, where he worked in the Litigation & Arbitration department.--$$cProvided by publisher.
000796181 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (viewed July 18, 2017).
000796181 650_0 $$aClass actions (Civil procedure)$$zEuropean Union countries.
000796181 650_0 $$aConflict of laws$$zEuropean Union countries.
000796181 852__ $$bebk
000796181 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-6265-186-9$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000796181 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:796181$$pGLOBAL_SET
000796181 980__ $$aEBOOK
000796181 980__ $$aBIB
000796181 982__ $$aEbook
000796181 983__ $$aOnline
000796181 994__ $$a92$$bISE