Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements; Contents; Abbreviations; 1 Introduction; Abstract; 1.1 Definitions of International Crimes, State Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism; 1.2 Why Do We Need a Definition for Terrorism?; 1.3 Terrorism and the ICC: Why Terrorism Was Not Included into the Rome Statute; 1.3.1 Efforts to Include Terrorism into the Rome Statute; 1.3.2 Why Terrorism Was Not Included into the Rome Statute; 1.4 State Sovereignty Theories and International Law; 1.4.1 State-Centric Theory and Cosmopolitanism in International Law
1.4.2 Procedural and Substantive Issues of the Relationship Between State Sovereignty and International Criminal Law1.5 The Architecture of the Book: The Interplay Between State Sovereignty Theories and Cosmopolitanism on the Process of Criminalisation and Definition of Aggression and Terrorism; References; 2 State Sovereignty, Cosmopolitanism and the International Criminal Court; Abstract; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 The Two Theories; 2.2.1 The Traditional State-Centric Theory About the Relationship Between Sovereignty and International Law; 2.2.2 Cosmopolitan Theory and International Law
2.3 Sovereignty and International Law: The UN Charter Provisions2.4 Sovereignty and International Law: The Rome Statute and the Principle of Complementarity; 2.4.1 Complementarity in Principle; 2.4.1.1 Conditions of Inadmissibility: Article 17; 2.4.1.2 'Inability' as Lack of Compatible Domestic Legislation; 2.4.2 Complementarity in Practice; 2.4.2.1 The Lubanga and Katanga Precedents: An Intrusive ICC?; 2.4.3 The Applicability of the Complementarity Regime on Cases of Aggression; 2.5 Conclusion; References
3 The Paradigm of Aggression: State-Centric and Cosmopolitan Approaches in the Effort to Outlaw and Criminalise AggressionAbstract; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 The Covenant of the League of Nations: A Cosmopolitan Idea with a State-Centric Application; 3.3 A Cosmopolitan Approach: 'Crimes Against Peace' Under the Nuremberg and Tokyo Charters; 3.4 A State-Centric Approach: 'Act of Aggression' Under the UN Charter and UNGA Resolution 3314; 3.4.1 The Discretionary Powers of the Security Council Under UN Charter Article 39; 3.4.2 The UNGA Resolution 3314: A Poor Legal Precedent; 3.5 Conclusion
1.4.2 Procedural and Substantive Issues of the Relationship Between State Sovereignty and International Criminal Law1.5 The Architecture of the Book: The Interplay Between State Sovereignty Theories and Cosmopolitanism on the Process of Criminalisation and Definition of Aggression and Terrorism; References; 2 State Sovereignty, Cosmopolitanism and the International Criminal Court; Abstract; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 The Two Theories; 2.2.1 The Traditional State-Centric Theory About the Relationship Between Sovereignty and International Law; 2.2.2 Cosmopolitan Theory and International Law
2.3 Sovereignty and International Law: The UN Charter Provisions2.4 Sovereignty and International Law: The Rome Statute and the Principle of Complementarity; 2.4.1 Complementarity in Principle; 2.4.1.1 Conditions of Inadmissibility: Article 17; 2.4.1.2 'Inability' as Lack of Compatible Domestic Legislation; 2.4.2 Complementarity in Practice; 2.4.2.1 The Lubanga and Katanga Precedents: An Intrusive ICC?; 2.4.3 The Applicability of the Complementarity Regime on Cases of Aggression; 2.5 Conclusion; References
3 The Paradigm of Aggression: State-Centric and Cosmopolitan Approaches in the Effort to Outlaw and Criminalise AggressionAbstract; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 The Covenant of the League of Nations: A Cosmopolitan Idea with a State-Centric Application; 3.3 A Cosmopolitan Approach: 'Crimes Against Peace' Under the Nuremberg and Tokyo Charters; 3.4 A State-Centric Approach: 'Act of Aggression' Under the UN Charter and UNGA Resolution 3314; 3.4.1 The Discretionary Powers of the Security Council Under UN Charter Article 39; 3.4.2 The UNGA Resolution 3314: A Poor Legal Precedent; 3.5 Conclusion