000806892 000__ 02925cam\a2200481Ii\4500
000806892 001__ 806892
000806892 005__ 20230306143843.0
000806892 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000806892 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000806892 008__ 170321s2017\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000806892 020__ $$a9783319500041$$q(electronic book)
000806892 020__ $$a331950004X$$q(electronic book)
000806892 020__ $$z9783319500034
000806892 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1$$2doi
000806892 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)ocn978248704
000806892 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)978248704
000806892 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dN$T$$dOCLCF$$dYDX$$dNJR$$dAZU$$dUPM$$dVT2$$dIAS$$dUAB
000806892 049__ $$aISEA
000806892 050_4 $$aRC43
000806892 08204 $$a344.04/1$$223
000806892 1001_ $$aBlitz, Marc Jonathan,$$eauthor.
000806892 24510 $$aSearching minds by scanning brains :$$bneuroscience technology and constitutional privacy protection /$$cMarc Jonathan Blitz.
000806892 264_1 $$aCham :$$bPalgrave Macmillan,$$c[2017]
000806892 264_4 $$c©2017
000806892 300__ $$a1 online resource.
000806892 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000806892 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000806892 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000806892 347__ $$atext file$$bPDF$$2rda
000806892 4901_ $$aPalgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior
000806892 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000806892 5050_ $$a1. Introduction -- 2. Constitutional Puzzles (and (Neuro)technological Changes -- 3. Lie Detection, Mind Reading, and Brain Reading -- 4. The Fifth Amendment: Self-Incrimination and the Brain -- 5. The Fourth (and First) Amendment -- 6. Conclusion. .
000806892 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000806892 520__ $$aThis book examines the ethical and legal challenges presented by modern techniques of memory retrieval, especially within the context of potential use by the US government in courts of law. Specifically, Marc Blitz discusses the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause. He also argues that we should pay close attention to another constitutional provision that individuals generally don’t think of as protecting their privacy: The First Amendment’s freedom of speech. First Amendment values also protect our freedom of thought, and this—not simply our privacy—is what is at stake if government engaged in excessive monitoring of our minds. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA, and series editor of Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior.
000806892 588__ $$aOnline resource ; title from PDF title page (viewed March 24, 2017).
000806892 650_0 $$aNeurosciences$$xLaw and legislation.
000806892 650_0 $$aNeurosciences$$xMoral and ethical aspects.
000806892 650_0 $$aPrivacy, Right of.
000806892 830_0 $$aPalgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior.
000806892 852__ $$bebk
000806892 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000806892 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:806892$$pGLOBAL_SET
000806892 980__ $$aEBOOK
000806892 980__ $$aBIB
000806892 982__ $$aEbook
000806892 983__ $$aOnline
000806892 994__ $$a92$$bISE